Objective ECM vs OpenText Extended ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Objective Logo
561 views|515 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
4,062 views|3,113 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Objective ECM and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing is not that complex for the core products, but it becomes more complicated for some additional modules."
  • "Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."
  • "It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."
  • "The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."
  • "The product is pricey."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM's pricing and licensing are aggressive and confusing for the end customer."
  • More OpenText Extended ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where… more »
    Top Answer:It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long… more »
    Top Answer:We make iterations on it. Every year, they usually ask for some small things. Overall, they are pretty happy with it. Being the IT person here, I do think there are areas for improvement, but both for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    561
    Comparisons
    515
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    4,062
    Comparisons
    3,113
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    692
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

    OpenText Extended ECM (formerly OpenText Content Suite Platform) is an enterprise content management platform that securely governs the information lifecycle by integrating with leading enterprise applications, such as SAP, Microsoft 365, Salesforce and SAP SuccessFactors. Bringing content and processes together, Extended ECM provides access to information when and where it’s needed, improves decision-making and drives operational effectiveness.

    Sample Customers
    ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
    ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government34%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Objective ECM is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Objective ECM is rated 4.0, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and Hyland OnBase.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.