IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Objective ECM vs OpenText Content Suite Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."
  • More OpenText Content Suite Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    621,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Both OpenText ECM and IBM FileNet share are expensive.
    Top Answer:Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.
    Ranking
    Views
    689
    Comparisons
    565
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    6,398
    Comparisons
    4,749
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    493
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Livelink ECM, OpenText ECM, OpenText Content Suite
    Learn More
    Overview

    Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

    OpenText Enterprise Information Management (EIM) technologies and business solutions allow organizations to take full advantage of enterprise information and gain better business insight, create a positive business impact, increase process velocity, reduce risks related to information governance, and protect intellectual property from internal leaks and external threats. OpenText provides solutions in the core EIM categories of ECM, BPM, CEM, Information Exchange, and Discovery.

    Offer
    Learn more about Objective ECM
    Learn more about OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Sample Customers
    ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
    KUKA Roboter GmbH, MAN Diesel & Turbo, FMC Technologies, Alcatel-Lucent, KHS GmbH, The Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, COMM-UNITY EDV GmbH, BwFuhrparkService GmbH, Swarovski, Hydro One, Viega
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government35%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, OpenText and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: July 2022.
    621,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Objective ECM is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management while OpenText Content Suite Platform is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Objective ECM is rated 0.0, while OpenText Content Suite Platform is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Suite Platform writes "Scalable, verifies complex solutions, and the support we receive is good". Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, Micro Focus Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence, whereas OpenText Content Suite Platform is most compared with OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet, SharePoint, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.