Planview PPM Pro vs nTask comparison

nTask and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. nTask is ranked #92, while Planview is ranked #19. nTask holds a 0.4% mindshare in PMS, compared to Planview’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of nTask users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Planview users who would recommend it.

nTask

Read 1 nTask review

541 Views
498 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview PPM Pro

Read 32 Planview PPM Pro reviews

3,514 Views
2,249 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

nTask

Planview PPM Pro

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planview PPM Pro and nTask based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Asana and others in Project Management Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,692 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

nTask

Ranking in Project Management Software

92nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview PPM Pro

Ranking in Project Management Software

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of nTask is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview PPM Pro is 1.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview PPM Pro	1.3%
nTask	0.4%
Other	98.3%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Ayesha Mujeeb

Associate Software Engineer at NAXXA Consulting

User-friendly, cost-effective, and efficient

The most valuable feature of nTask is its user-friendly interface. Its simplicity makes it easy to navigate, and the consistent structure across modules means the tool guides you intuitively. This is especially beneficial for those who aren't tech-savvy or haven't worked with complex tools before. Being part of a small team, cost efficiency is crucial for us, and nTask fits well within our budget while providing all the necessary features. Additionally, we find the Gantt chart feature particularly useful for planning fundraisers with various task dependencies. The reporting feature ensures accuracy in our financial work. Being a small team, we appreciate nTask's customization options in the business plan.

Read full review

reviewer2004219

Management consultant at Sloan Consulting

Easy to use with flexible reporting, excellent visibility, and solid customer support

The status reporting is the most valuable feature as it's easy to use; it's simple for project managers to enter their information, and the reporting features are very flexible. Planview PPM enables us to create reusable project templates that reflect our project management life cycle. We were able to garner some best practices by using Planview templates, but they are also flexible enough to modify without having to customize the solution. The distinction between ''customize'' and ''configure'' is important here. When it comes to viewing projects and timelines, the solution is excellent. The views are easy to access and highly configurable. The solution provides managers with the insight they need to empower decision-making and help them manage risk, as it allows them to see when projects are over budget and behind schedule. Planview helped to reduce project delays because we can see when they occur and take proactive steps to remedy the situation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of nTask is its user-friendly interface."

"I've worked at many different companies, and the customer service and the support from Daptiv are unlike anything I've encountered before. They far excel any other company I've worked with. I always say to people that Daptiv is like a sub-department in your company. You don't realize they're a vendor. It feels like you're working with somebody who is part of your own company."

"We are expecting it to connect funding and strategic outcomes with work execution."

"I liked the dashboards because I need to report out on tasks completed in the last two weeks, tasks scheduled for the next two weeks, what the risks and health are. What I've been able to do is create reports based on that and then put those reports into a dashboard. The old reporting was clunky, but the beta reports got better. But then I couldn't add the beta reports to the dashboards so now they released the new beta dashboards and it works great. It does everything I need to do."

"It is flexible, because so far we haven't been able to figure out anything that it cannot do. It's highly configurable. We've added custom field design screens to fit our needs, develop reports, and dashboards that give us the ability to deliver much better information, especially to senior IT management."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."

"It has brought our organization to using one tool for requests, project management, and time-tracking."

"Time tracking, portfolio management reporting, and what-if analysis create visibility into project planning, resource capacity, and demand planning."

"It gave us a clarity of purpose. Everybody knows what they are doing and that they are all aligned: Managers know what employees are doing. Employees know what they are doing and the managers think they should be doing. That is the clarity which really helps in efficiency."

More Planview PPM Pro pros

Cons

"nTask currently lacks a direct chat or communication feature."

"The fully integrated solution that PPM Pro said they had between PPM Pro and Projectplace was not a true statement after implementation."

"One thing in particular I'd suggest is that we used the fast track service to implement PPM Pro. While it had a lot of value to it, people may be expecting a different experience, an experience where maybe an entourage of consultants come onsite to help you do the implementation, as opposed to working over the phone with just one resource."

"The integration with some of these other tools that we use, like the Azure DevOps needs improvement."

"This solution does not work well as a task management system because it is very difficult to expand beyond just the basic tasks, and this would be a worthwhile area for improvement."

"The downside to the way the solution tracks time is if your project manager doesn't add you to the project, you won't see it on your timesheet, even if you did do work."

"The reporting has some areas for improvement. It is not always as simple as we would like to get the reports we want or the information that we want."

"I think PPM Pro is going to release a resource self-service admin which is going to duplicate the standard groups. I think that will help us a lot because right now a standard group has their own permission and we don't know what permission is getting out to the users. After the resource self-service admin will be in place, I think we will be in a much better position in terms of the formation profile."

"The calculated field area needs improvement. There are a lot of formulas and functions available to make a calculated field, but it is still not comprehensive. We process the data to represent it through a report or dashboard. Due to the current constraints, for complex calculations, we do the data processing outside PPM Pro."

More Planview PPM Pro cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing was fair and I thought it was comparable to the other ones that we looked at. Other than ServiceNow, it was the most expensive, but we knew we were going to get a lot of value for that, so we went with it. We paid $40,000 for the implementation and for the workshops."

"Bulk volume discounts are a little better. Right now we have to buy in lots of 20 at $200 a license. That's a little steep. For example, with Service Now, I pay $48 a seat for a license."

"My advice is to pay attention to integration opportunities to reduce your licensing cost with Planview. There are additional costs for consulting services and advanced customer support."

"Because we have PPM Pro with Project place, we transitioned to the Flex model."

"$6 million has been the return on investment so far, and that was because of work intake. Now that we are scrutinizing the work intake and asking questions like, "Is there an alternative to your $10 million project?" We had one project come in for $10 million, scrutinize it through our gate review process, and wound up with the alternative, which was $3.8 million. So, a $6 million savings."

"We have their Flex plan."

"The cost was in line."

"The pricing for me is more about understanding your own needs in the company because it is one license for one person model. So, you have to really understand how many licenses you need and what may be the influx of your staff. The good thing about Daptiv is that we just need a quick telephone call to our customer success manager if we want to increase our licensing. It takes a day or two to do. So, we can upscale very quickly. We've never downscaled, but I'm guessing if we had to, we'd have to wait till the contract completes or renegotiate a different licensing cost. So, you definitely need to understand what different types of licenses provide from a functionality point of view, and then order 10% more than you need based on the influx of staff in the company. There are costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. We have the report functionality for which we pay separately for 10 hours per month."

More Planview PPM Pro pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Comparisons

No data available

Planview Portfolios vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 8% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 5% of the time

Planview AdaptiveWork vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 4% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview PPM Pro Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

May 2026

Download nTask product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview PPM Pro

May 2026

Download Planview PPM Pro product report

Also Known As

No data available

Innotas

Overview

nTask is an intuitive project management tool designed for teams and individuals seeking effective task planning and collaboration. It offers a suite of features that streamline workflow processes while providing flexibility for improvement.

nTask caters to a diverse range of projects, offering tools that enhance task coordination and resource management. Its platform supports teams in tracking progress and achieving objectives, although some reviews suggest that performance could be optimized for larger projects. Continuous updates aim to address these areas for enhancement.

What are the key features of nTask?

Task Management: Allows users to assign, prioritize, and manage tasks efficiently.
Time Tracking: Integrates time management functionalities to monitor project timelines.
Collaboration Tools: Provides features for team communication and document sharing.
Project Planning: Offers Gantt charts and other tools for detailed planning and scheduling.
Risk Management: Identifies and assesses potential project risks.

What benefits can users expect to find?

Productivity Boost: Improved task assignment and monitoring lead to enhanced efficiency.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized workspace supports better team interaction.
Cost-Effective: Offers affordable pricing plans for small to mid-sized teams.
Flexibility: Adaptable to different project sizes and types, with ongoing enhancements.
Decision Support: Provides data-driven insights for informed decision-making.

nTask has found applications across sectors like IT, marketing, and education, where teams utilize it for its project coordination and communication features. Industries that rely on agile methodologies have particularly benefited from its agile-focused tools and integration capabilities, helping adapt and scale project efforts efficiently.

nTask

Planview PPM Pro offers a cloud-based platform focused on enhancing project management with high configurability and flexibility, supporting organizations in streamlining tasks and decisions.

Planview PPM Pro is recognized for its robust reporting capabilities, customizable project templates, and effective resource management. As a cloud-based solution, it enhances workflow efficiency and project visibility through integration with other tools. Features like timesheet tracking, dashboard capabilities, and Kanban views optimize resource and demand management. Although users value its functionality, there is room for improvement in areas such as capacity and financial management, intuitive reporting, and modern dashboards. Enhancements in integration with tools such as JIRA and Outlook, as well as improved task management and Agile functionality, are also desired.

What are the key features?

Configurable Platform: Offers high flexibility to adapt to changing project needs.
Robust Reporting: Provides comprehensive reporting tools for insights.
Resource Management: Helps in optimizing resource allocation.
Customizable Templates: Allows personalization of project templates.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools for better efficiency.

What benefits can be expected?

Improved Project Visibility: Streamlines project tracking through enhanced dashboard capabilities.
Efficiency Boost: Integrations lead to enhanced workflow productivity.
Effective Resource Utilization: Optimizes resource and demand management with its advanced tools.
Enhanced Strategic Decisions: Facilitates informed decision-making with detailed project insights.

Planview PPM Pro is primarily used in IT project management to centralize project practices and manage resources effectively. Organizations leverage it for strategic planning, time tracking, and portfolio analytics. It supports project management offices and cross-divisional collaboration, visualizing business demand and creating detailed reports. Integration with LeanKit empowers agile methodologies and project lifecycle transparency.

Planview

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Weather Channel, corcs, Crayola, Scan Health Plan, Vermont, Bank of the West, North West Company, University of Southern Mississippi, Jeffries, Purdue University, Chesterfield County Virginia, City of Memphis

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.