• Home
  • NMQA QABook vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

NMQA QABook vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NMQA Logo

NMQA QABook

17 views|7 comparisons
Panaya Logo

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 5 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews
14 views|5 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Use NMQA QABook?
Alain Vanhaeght
More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."
  • "It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

    • More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Defect Tracking solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?
    Top Answer:The solution helps with recording and documentation.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panaya Test Dynamix?
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a six or seven out of ten.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?
    Top Answer:We cannot create test cases. Nothing is automatic. The tool hasn’t reduced our testing time. I have to do the manual testing. The version of the solution that I am using does not have the option to… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 8 in Defect Tracking
    Views
    17
    Comparisons
    7
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 8 in Defect Tracking
    Views
    14
    Comparisons
    5
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    488
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    QABook
    Learn More
    NMQA
    Video Not Available
    Panaya
    Overview
    Test management product that is offered on premises or in the cloud via desktop, Microsoft SharePoint, or the web.

    Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

    With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

    Sample Customers
    Capgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI
    Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Wholesaler/Distributor5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%

    NMQA QABook is ranked 7th in Defect Tracking while Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 2nd in Defect Tracking with 5 reviews. NMQA QABook is rated 0.0, while Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options". NMQA QABook is most compared with , whereas Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest, Worksoft Certify, Zephyr Enterprise and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.

    See our list of best Defect Tracking vendors.

    We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.