We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Oracle BPEL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable product."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"The technical support is very good."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The product has everything we need."
"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 8th in Process Automation with 21 reviews while Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPEL report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
