Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nintex Process Platform vs QualiWare X comparison

Nintex and QualiWare are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while QualiWare is ranked #39 with an average rating of 6.0. Nintex holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to QualiWare’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.
Nintex Process Platform
Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews
  • 2,623 Views
  • 1,564 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
QualiWare X
Read 3 QualiWare X reviews
  • 118 Views
  • 66 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

QualiWare X and Nintex Process Platform compete in the enterprise solutions and process management category. While QualiWare X is praised for its pricing and customer support, Nintex Process Platform offers a comprehensive feature set that justifies its higher cost and makes it a strong contender.

Features: QualiWare X integrates enterprise architecture with model-driven capabilities, ideal for mapping, modeling, and optimizing business processes. It supports organizational alignment, has a focus on integrated compliance management, and offers a user-friendly interface. Nintex Process Platform excels in process automation and workflow management, enhancing operational efficiency. It offers strong integration capabilities, a visual workflow designer, and advanced analytics features. The key difference is the extensive automation potential of Nintex compared to QualiWare X’s modeling strength.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform’s cloud-friendly deployment allows for fast setups, while QualiWare X offers both on-premise and cloud solutions, suiting organizations with specific IT policies. Nintex tends to lead in customer service with more comprehensive support. QualiWare X provides detailed documentation and consultation services, aiding customers in complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: QualiWare X features a more attractive initial setup cost, ensuring gradual ROI through lower pricing, suitable for varied budgets. Nintex Process Platform presents quicker ROI through its automation capabilities despite higher setup costs. The investment in Nintex is often recouped through efficiency gains and operational cost reduction.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform vs. QualiWare X
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)
QualiWare X
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
39th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye - PeerSpot reviewer
Straightforward interface and user-friendly
There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.
Read full review
Gavin Bérubé - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive
We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material.  I like the solution's traceability.  The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."
More Nintex Process Platform pros
"I like the solution's traceability."
 

Cons

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
More Nintex Process Platform cons
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."
"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."
"Our maintenance costs are reduced."
"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."
"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."
"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."
"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."
"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."
More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
35%
Computer Software Company
15%
Media Company
5%
Construction Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?
The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?
Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.
See all answers
What needs improvement with K2?
The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
See all answers
What do you like most about QualiWare X?
I like the solution's traceability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QualiWare X?
I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with QualiWare X?
The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 21% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 10% of the time
Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 7% of the time
Appian vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Appian vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Nintex Process Platform Competitors
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X
Compared 100% of the time
More QualiWare X Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform
April 2025
Nintex Process Platform reportDownload Nintex Process Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Architecture Management
March 2025
QualiWare X reportDownload QualiWare X product report
 

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
No data available
 

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?
  • Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
  • Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
  • Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
  • Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
  • Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
  • Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
  • Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
  • Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
  • Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex
QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.
QualiWare
 

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform vs. QualiWare X
April 2025
Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. QualiWare X
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nintex Process Platform vs. QualiWare X report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.