NinjaOne vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor comparison

NinjaOne and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. NinjaOne is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while SolarWinds is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. NinjaOne holds a 3.6% mindshare in SM, compared to SolarWinds’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NinjaOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

NinjaOne

Read 25 NinjaOne reviews

14,156 Views
2,265 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Read 44 SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor reviews

7,115 Views
2,206 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and NinjaOne are competing products in IT management solutions. NinjaOne's efficient deployment and customer service often give it an advantage over SolarWinds despite its broad capabilities.

Features: SolarWinds provides robust monitoring with capabilities like application tracking and performance insights, essential for IT infrastructure management. Its integration with other SolarWinds products further enhances its utility. NinjaOne excels with a simplified interface, effective remote IT management, and strong automation features, offering a more streamlined user experience.

Room for Improvement: SolarWinds' complex setup could be simplified to improve user accessibility. Broad feature integration may also be highlighted for better user adaptability. NinjaOne could enhance its interface sophistication for advanced users, include more in-depth monitoring features, and improve zooming capabilities during remote sessions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds, due to its wide range of features, has a more complex setup process, but offers extensive support through its community and resources. NinjaOne is known for quick deployment and strong customer service, facilitating easy adoption with minimal downtime and more direct support, a significant benefit for organizations.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds offers competitive pricing with scalability options, presenting a good ROI for companies leveraging its extensive toolset, though initial setup costs may be higher. NinjaOne provides a cost-effective solution with an attractive pricing model and fast ROI due to efficient deployment and strong customer support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne

Ranking in Server Monitoring

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (8th), Network Monitoring Software (10th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (8th), Vulnerability Management (18th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (4th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (6th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), Patch Management (3rd), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (5th)

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (18th), Active Directory Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 3.6%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is 2.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NinjaOne	3.6%
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor	2.9%
Other	93.5%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Not Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support

NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Read full review

NikhilKalwint

Technical Specialist at ServiceIO

Monitoring over a thousand systems has improved decision making and operational visibility

From an advantage perspective, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is comparatively cheaper from a commercial point of view. It is easy to install and configure, very user-friendly, and quick to get up and running, allowing you to see the early value adds in your organization. It is compatible with most technologies for monitoring with very few chances of incompatibility. Configuration also allows us to monitor all the technical parameters we are looking for, making it a very good experience for us. The alerting feature in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is a main advantage, as it alerts based on threshold breaches and can raise tickets to the ticketing system, send SMS, and email notifications, allowing engineers to work on those tickets to resolve issues and avoid further impact. The visibility into server health is a beneficial feature that I am utilizing. We widely use various application performance metrics in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor such as database monitoring and server monitoring, which are quite good enough for any monitoring solution. We utilize the customizable dashboards in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is related to its remote access...I know that NinjaOne's technical support is good."

"The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten."

"NinjaOne's best feature is its monitoring."

"NinjaOne helped us address our user complaints regarding the system as well as providing us the ability to push software updates directly from NinjaOne to the user's device."

"Good at managing updates and for remote support."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."

"NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance."

More NinjaOne pros

"There are many valuable features, including the network configuration manager, and the network performance manager."

"We manage SolarWinds ourselves without outsourcing its services."

"We choose the Solarwinds based on the simplication of managing the tool itself."

"The recommendations are a life saver."

"The OOTB (Out of the Box) implementation does have very good node specific pages and can provide a wealth of information."

"SolarWinds fit the bill because it gave many possibilities in monitoring with a good amount of out of the box capabilities."

"I have found the visibility into server health with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor very beneficial, which we use on a daily basis."

"The solution has good alerts; notifications are sent via email to technicians, and you can filter the kinds of alerts you want to receive as well, which is excellent."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pros

Cons

"I would like to see the software reduced to focus on inventory or remote help tools since many of its current functionalities are not needed."

"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."

"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne. It also didn't integrate with Trend Micro, which we were using previously. I would also like to have more control from the mobile app. As of now, I am able to see some performance values, but I can't see, for example, disk activity or disk performance values. If they can improve their app a little bit, it would help greatly. They can also improve the tech interface. If I assign certain techs to a bunch of specific machines, they only get those alerts that they're assigned to."

"The one feature that I believe needs improvement is the software patching."

"The ability to not have a NinjaOne agent or multiple NinjaOne agents on a singular device is a big pain point for the device, and secondly, the macOS support is also what keeps it from being a higher score."

"The remote connectivity could be better. It works most of the time, but sometimes, there are issues."

"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne."

"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."

More NinjaOne cons

"Reporting is the only thing with which we currently have challenges. They have this in two ways. There is the report writer, which is the backend, and we also have web reports, which are on the console. So, they have removed the report writer for the backend reports, and we are making use of the web console, but most of the users are not finding it very interesting to use the frontend reports. I would like them to bring back the report writer. That's the key area within it to improve on the reporting. If they can bring back the report writer, then most users will actually be comfortable. I have some customers who are trying to export their report to an Excel format, but it is not possible because they said any report that has been done from the web console cannot be exported to Excel, but most of the customers need to export their reports to Excel. That's one area they need to work on."

"They should incorporate more artificial intelligence. There should also be more predictive features."

"The stability, flexibility, and ease of use could be improved."

"Nodes in Azure are able to be monitored with the use of agents, but this does not apply to cloud service offerings that are not node based."

"An additional feature that would improve this solution is the ability to complete root cause analysis."

"The tool's AppStack needs to improve in the storage monitoring part. It should also include an analytics and recommendation approach. If I have found a fault in a server or application, I would like to know what caused it and how do I recover from it."

"SAM's software-defined network monitoring capability is also low and could be improved."

"It needs time-based functions for monitoring. Some things need to be polled on a specific schedule or only during a specific window."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

"Its pricing is great."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

"The solution's price is reasonable. Though it's on the higher side, the tool is worth the money."

"Nagios XI, WhatsUpGold, Uptime Software, PRTG, Manage Engine, and SpiceWorks are the other tools that have lower pricing and licensing costs. However, they can't compete with SolarWinds when it comes to the features and functionality that SolarWinds can provide."

"I have always said SolarWinds is very “proud” of their products, meaning they are expensive. I cannot afford to purchase all the licenses I need for all the SolarWinds products."

"Pricing and licensing is fair for what you get. It does have a great bang-for-the-buck appeal."

"When compared to other licensed models in the market, it stands out as one of the more cost-effective options."

"We pay around $ 2,000 to $ 5,000 yearly for the solution."

"I would rate the pricing for this solution a three out of five."

"Its licensing is on a yearly basis. It is just the standard price, but it can vary depending on the current rate of the dollar."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?

My main use case for NinjaOne is managing machines over multiple networks and locations. For managing machines across those networks or locations, we have NinjaOne deployed on all our machines, and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

The initial cost is quite high, but the renewal cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

There is definitely room for improvement besides simplifying its setup. As a non-technical person, I believe the dashboards could be improved. Everything we use appears on video walls, and we need ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

I am doing research as we currently have both solutions, and I am looking to see if we need both or can manage with one. Currently, the outcome indicates that we need both. The focus point is diffe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

Tanium vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

Kaseya 365 vs NinjaOne

Compared 2% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Opsview vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

June 2026

Download NinjaOne product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

June 2026

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds SAM

Overview

NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.

NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.

What are the most important features?

Remote Monitoring: Essential for real-time insights into network and device performance.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency in IT management.
Patch Management: Timely updates for software and system security.
Mobile App: Ensures alerts and management capabilities on the go.
Third-Party Integrations: Enhances functionality by working with tools like Bitdefender.

What benefits can users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Appeals to small companies seeking budget-friendly IT solutions.
Performance Tracking: Improved SLA system aids in efficient performance monitoring.
Enhanced Management: Effective use of scripts and policies streamline operations.
Client Interaction: Better remote session management and asset control.

NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.

NinjaOne

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides comprehensive server, application, and infrastructure monitoring, focusing on integration, application dependency, and network insights through user-friendly interfaces and detailed dashboards.

With AppStack and AppInsight support, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers service management, detailed resource dashboards, and integration capabilities. It monitors hardware metrics and performance parameters, facilitating database and network insights for cloud and virtual environments. Robust alerting, predictive analytics, and capacity planning ensure efficient management of server health and application performance.

What are the key features?

Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing tools.
AppStack: Provides a holistic view of applications.
AppInsight: Supports widely-used applications.
SNMP Polling: Efficient network data collection.
Diagnostics: Real-time troubleshooting.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored monitoring views.

What benefits should users expect?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Extends from servers to databases.
Transparent Control: Enhances visibility into performance metrics.
User-Friendly: Simplifies proactive monitoring with alerts.
Predictive Features: Supports capacity and trend planning.

Industries implement SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor to enhance server utilization reporting, network configuration, and AV equipment performance tracking. They benefit from monitoring critical services across diverse deployment models, improving management efficiency and decision-making.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.