NetWitness NDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

NetWitness and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. NetWitness is ranked #59, while OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5. NetWitness holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of NetWitness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetWitness NDR

Read 15 NetWitness NDR reviews

1,789 Views
537 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,804 Views
1,606 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

NetWitness NDR

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

NetWitness NDR and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the network detection and endpoint security category. OpenText seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive security features, although NetWitness is preferred for its support and pricing.

Features: NetWitness NDR offers strong threat detection, network traffic analysis, and integration capabilities with various security products. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides advanced endpoint threat protection, automated remediation processes, and extensive threat intelligence support.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness NDR could benefit from simplified deployment, improved integration documentation, and better user interface customization. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection might improve with enhanced pricing transparency, reduced initial deployment costs, and more flexible policy management options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers streamlined deployment and consistent customer support. NetWitness NDR, though supported by a dedicated team, may require more complex setup, affecting deployment speed.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR offers an attractive pricing model and shorter ROI period, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection has a higher initial cost but provides significant returns over time due to its comprehensive protection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed NetWitness NDR vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetWitness NDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

59th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (40th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (61st), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (25th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (19th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (39th)

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of NetWitness NDR is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

SupravatMaji

Associate Vice President - IT Security at Inspira Enterprise

Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability

My advice to those wanting to implement RSA NetWitness Network is they have to first do a little due diligence, such as the exact requirement based on their needs. That will give them a direction for their investment because otherwise, the bill of material or bill of quantity (BOQ) may be higher side. It is important to do good due intelligence on the environment, see the exact requirement, and then go ahead with the solution. The solution is perfectly stable. I rate RSA NetWitness Network a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is stable. We have been using it for some time, without any issues."

"Technical support is knowledgeable."

"It helps our security team respond more accurately when there are threats, then we get less false positives or negatives."

"They have recently updated the features and the most valuable ones are the instant threat response, ease of use, web interface, integration, and easy access. RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very compatible with other solutions and technologies. However, they do not rely on third-party solutions and have most features built-in."

"The log correlation is good."

"We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our issues."

"The stability of the RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very good."

"This solution allows us to locate the malware in real-time."

More NetWitness NDR pros

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"Low performance requirements."

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"The contamination feature could be improved."

"RSA NetWitness Network could improve on integration with non-native application integration."

"This solution needs an upgrade in reporting. I have heard from RSA that they are working on this, but as of yet it is not available."

"NetWitness Endpoint's blocking feature does not work properly - if there's a malicious process, it's not possible to kill it via a custom rule unless and until it's flagged as malicious."

"The integration of the solution needs to be improved. The dashboard needs lots of updates as well. In the next release, we would like to see advanced fraud detection features."

"Its price could be improved. It is an expensive product. Its training is also too expensive. It would be great if they can have a better pricing scheme for the training."

"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

More NetWitness NDR cons

"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."

"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not have any opinion on the pricing or licensing of the product."

"It is an expensive product."

"The price of the solution depends on the environment. If the environment is large then it will cost more. However, the larger the environment with more endpoints, you will receive an increased discount. If the environment is very small, then you might think it is expensive. It is always better to buy in bulk to receive a discount. The minimum number of assets is usually 500, with discounts on 1000 and 2000."

"The pricing is not very economical. It is a quite costly product for India. One thing is that when you purchase it, you have to purchase a module separately."

"They can easily adjust if you have the requirements which are required. If you have a budget cut or a budget constraint, they can bend."

"NetWitness Endpoint is less costly than its competitors, but it offers fewer features."

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"The pricing is high."

"It is relatively cheap."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 13% of the time

Fidelis Elevate vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

Vectra AI vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 18% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

August 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

Free Report: NetWitness NDR vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about NetWitness NDR vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetWitness NDR vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.