Netsurion vs Snare comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Netsurion and Intersect Alliance are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Netsurion is ranked #49, while Intersect Alliance is ranked #54. Netsurion holds a 0.9% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Intersect Alliance’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Netsurion users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Intersect Alliance users who would recommend it.

Netsurion

Read 24 Netsurion reviews

6,128 Views
2,758 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Snare

Read 3 Snare reviews

3,436 Views
2,199 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netsurion

Snare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Snare and Netsurion are leading products in cybersecurity. Netsurion seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: Snare is praised for its robust log management, real-time alert capabilities, and effective data analysis. Netsurion offers advanced threat detection, easy integration with existing systems, and comprehensive reporting. Netsurion's feature set is broader, leading to higher user satisfaction.

Room for Improvement: Snare needs enhancement in scalability, has a steep learning curve, and requires better user interface design. Netsurion could improve its user documentation, resolve occasional integration issues, and streamline its reporting functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snare is well-regarded for its deployment model but needs a more intuitive setup process and better support documentation. Netsurion offers smoother deployment and proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Snare is cost-effective with moderate setup costs and solid ROI, but users suggest better clarity in pricing tiers. Netsurion, while slightly more expensive, provides a higher ROI due to its extensive feature set and better user satisfaction.

To learn more, read our detailed Netsurion vs. Snare Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Netsurion vs. Snare

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Netsurion

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

49th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (20th), SOC as a Service (8th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (30th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (44th)

Snare

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

54th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (46th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Netsurion is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snare is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Netsurion	0.9%
Snare	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

John-Berry

Information Technology Manager at ProfitSolv

The SOC center monitors, hunts, and notifies us of threats around the clock

I know they are working to resolve this issue, but Netsurion is currently unable to retrieve logs from S3 buckets. We use WP Engine for a lot of web hosting as well as AWS, and both of these platforms use S3 buckets. I would like Netsurion to be able to pull logs from Linux devices. We have some of that capability, and I believe they can do it. However, the way it works with Amazon is strange and glitchy. Therefore, working something out with Amazon would be great. Netsurion's SOC can be a bit too aggressive at times. We have asked them to adjust their playbook because I am tired of being notified about the same issue multiple times a day. I am aware of the issue, and it is not a cause for concern. Let's only take action on this issue if we see an actual problem.

Read full review

Frank Eargle

Information Security Engineer at Glasshouse Systems

A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up

We use Snare for picking up Windows logs, and we used to use it for SQL as well. We had used it for Linux once or twice. We're mainly using it for Windows and Windows flat files The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Of all the products and vendors that we've used, I've never had a more positive experience with a support team than with EventTracker's support team."

"If I were to look at logs manually, there's no way I could do that. As an example, they are 48 million logs processed a day. There is no way I could look at all 48 million of those. So, it gives me a good structure to be able to look at the different incidents which are created and do different searches."

"The network alert is the most valuable feature. That way, we in the IT department are aware of user lockout and invalid password attempts way before a user ever even calls in."

"We have also integrated our endpoint security into the Netsurion SIEM. That's important because we have all the events in one place; we don't have to manage them in multiple places. In addition, the embedded MITRE ATT&CK Framework was paramount in our decision to choose Managed Threat Protection because the MITRE Framework is the industry standard for threats."

"Their SOC team manages vulnerability management and IOC reviews. They stop bad processes when they happen. The best thing is their weekly reviews of what has been going on in the infrastructure as well as the things that they see and what we should look out for."

"Netsurion was easy to deploy. I have worked with other systems that were a little less complex, but they weren't quite as easy to deploy."

"Having this in place gives us the ability to see what's going on, on a daily basis, on all of our systems across the enterprise."

"When I looked last week, we probably averaged about 20 million log entries a day. So, we certainly can't individually manage that. Just looking at the reports, then trying to go back and find anything that was questionable, was a challenge. Therefore, the managed service has been invaluable to us in terms of being able to narrow the scope of what really needs to be looked at and bringing those things to our attention to be dealt with."

More Netsurion pros

"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."

"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."

"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."

Cons

"With version 8, there are quite a few things; the query tool was one of the big ones, and the query speed was one of the big ones, but they've made some great strides between versions 8 and 9."

"The MITRE ATT&CK framework could be faster when identifying and understanding sophisticated threats. Whenever something happens, we usually get notified a couple hours later."

"There are some issues with searches taking a long period of time, but they assured me that they have implemented a new search function that's available in version 9, but which requires a solid-state hard drive... Depending on how many logs you have it could take a long time to return the results if you're looking back prior to the last 30 days."

"The hosted on-premise hardware that we were using was having issues. The performance of it was horrendous, but we weren't using it."

"It would be great if they had a client for phones by which they could push a notification to us, as opposed to via email."

"Communication is always something that can be improved, but I feel that any time we've had a communication issue, it's quickly addressed when we bring those up at the monthly meetings. Usually, it's an individual that wasn't clear in the communication, it's not the process per se. You always have to be able to segregate if the process didn't work or an individual either didn't say the right thing or my people didn't understand what they were being told."

"Netsurion's threat detection and response aren't quite mature. I would expect a little more."

"Everything that I've wanted has been added in. EDR was added, and MITRE was added. Those were two big ones that we didn't even have to push for."

More Netsurion cons

"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."

"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."

"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EventTracker's subscription-based model is interesting as far as yearly license type stuff. It's nice because you know what it's going to be next year. We haven't really looked at any other solutions. The pricing at the time compared to the other solutions was a lot less. A couple of years ago, we actually looked at Splunk. The amount in Splunk's licensing model is based on 20 gigs a day, or something like that. Based on our number of logs and stuff that we were already generating, the costs would be substantially more for the amount of logs that we would be getting."

"I don't know if the pricing is by the seat but we're paying about $20,000 to 25,000 a year. On top of that, we pay for the managed support services. That runs us about another $35,000 or $40,000 a year."

"We put together the package of what we needed. It was based pretty much on the number of agents that we were deploying. If we needed to manage logging from certain specific applications, like Active Directory and SQL Server, there has been no additional cost for that. We had agents deployed for those specific servers and the applications were included, then there was just an additional installation that they had to do for us."

"We have seen time and cost savings. It prevents us from having to hire specialized people for this type of work. We would need to hire six staff members to accommodate the same service."

"Licensing is very easy. Our CIO takes care of the billing, but in terms of price point, he hasn't complained, so it must be good."

"The upfront costs have increased, and we have been locked into this contract. The cost of changing over from it is way too high."

"It is a bit expensive as compared to some of the other products that have come out in recent years. Expense-wise, the only downside is that it is not cheap."

"Our budget follows the calendar year. We just started a new budget year at the beginning of the month. We did budget for an increase in our threat management system selection. Therefore, we have the budget to implement and accommodate a threat management system change, including an increase for the quoted actions that we received to improve EventTracker. We are just waiting on our council to approve that budget, which might not be for a little while. Hopefully, when they do, we will be able to jump on doing something."

More Netsurion pricing and cost advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Snare's pricing a four out of ten."

"Snare is a cheap solution because a lot of customers are using it."

"Snare has reasonable pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs Netsurion

Compared 7% of the time

GoSecure Titan Platform vs Netsurion

Compared 7% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Netsurion

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Netsurion

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Netsurion

Compared 4% of the time

More Netsurion Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Snare

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Security vs Snare

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Snare

Compared 5% of the time

Fortra's Tripwire Log Center vs Snare

Compared 4% of the time

Cribl vs Snare

Compared 4% of the time

More Snare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Netsurion

September 2026

Download Netsurion product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

September 2026

Download Snare product report

Also Known As

Netsurion Managed Threat Protection, Netsurion EventTracker

No data available

Overview

Netsurion offers robust SIEM capabilities enhanced by managed services, facilitating efficient threat identification and response with real-time alerts and comprehensive reporting.

Netsurion stands out for its integration of SIEM, IDS, and vulnerability management. Its real-time threat alerts and dashboards enhance user response capabilities. With centralized logging from Windows, Linux, Cisco devices, firewalls, and Active Directory, Netsurion enables effective compliance support for HIPAA and PCI standards. Managed Threat Protection with the embedded MITRE ATT&CK Framework enhances threat intelligence, while its evolving interface aims to improve user interactions. However, some users find deployment and searching challenging, pointing to areas for improvement.

What are Netsurion's key features?

SIEM Capabilities: Efficient threat identification using real-time alerts and dashboards.
Managed Services: Provides remote monitoring and advisory support.
Comprehensive Reporting: Assists in compliance and actionable insights.
MITRE ATT&CK Framework: Enhances threat intelligence and management.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing systems for streamlined operations.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Threat Response Tool: Rapid identification and response to security incidents.
Usability: Efforts to evolve and simplify user interactions.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined processes through integration and managed services.
Compliance Support: Assistance with industry standards like HIPAA and PCI.

Netsurion is frequently implemented in industries requiring comprehensive security monitoring and compliance, such as healthcare and finance. It aids businesses in consolidating security efforts, offering insights into user activities and system changes, an asset for companies lacking substantial internal resources.

Netsurion

Snare provides scalable log management solutions tailored for enterprises seeking efficient security and compliance. It collects logs from diverse environments, enabling real-time monitoring and response.

Snare is designed to facilitate seamless integration of log data to aid in security intelligence and policy adherence. It's versatile in capturing logs across platforms, offering organizations the ability to centralize monitoring efforts. With its robust analytics framework, businesses can detect anomalies and ensure regulatory compliance more effectively.

What are Snare’s most important features?

Centralized log management: Consolidates logs from various sources for comprehensive analysis.
Real-time monitoring: Allows immediate threat detection and response across networks.
Compliance reporting: Provides built-in templates to facilitate quick compliance checks.
Scalability: Supports growing data volumes with ease, ensuring performance consistency.
Cross-platform support: Enables integration with systems like Windows, Linux, and more.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual log aggregation and analysis.
Enhanced threat detection: Improves security posture by identifying risks proactively.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing compared to traditional log solutions.
User-friendly configuration: Streamlines setup processes without extensive training.
Flexible deployment options: Allows adaptable implementation in cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments.

In finance, Snare helps meet compliance standards by providing comprehensive audit trails. Retail sectors use it for detecting fraud while maintaining data integrity. Technology companies leverage its scalability to monitor expansive infrastructures effectively.

Intersect Alliance

Sample Customers

The Salvation Army, The FRESH Market, Pacific Western Bank, NASA, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), and Talbot’s Stores

Military, Defence and Security Agencies, Banking Finance and Insurance companies, Retail, Health and Utilities.

Buyer's Guide

Netsurion vs. Snare

September 2026

Free Report: Netsurion vs. Snare

Find out what your peers are saying about Netsurion vs. Snare and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Netsurion vs. Snare report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.