


IBM Security QRadar and Netsurion are competitors in the security information and event management (SIEM) space. IBM Security QRadar has the upper hand in terms of feature richness and real-time alerting capabilities, while Netsurion provides a strong offering with its emphasis on managed services and pricing.
Features: IBM Security QRadar’s valuable features include data enrichment, predefined connectors, and advanced threat detection. These elements aid in effective integration and real-time alerting. Netsurion features robust event monitoring and reporting, leveraging the MITRE ATT&CK Framework, but it lacks some of the predefined capabilities QRadar offers.
Room for Improvement: IBM QRadar could improve by streamlining its upgrade process, reducing false positives, and enhancing integration with other systems. Conversely, Netsurion needs to refine agent deployment and enhance integration with Linux systems while also working on improving its UI user experience and SOC communication.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security QRadar offers diverse deployment models with mixed feedback regarding its technical support's response time and availability. Netsurion supports primarily on-premises deployment, accompanied by excellent managed service offerings and responsive customer support, though weekend support could be improved to enhance user experience.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar’s pricing is competitive but higher, offering significant ROI in terms of employee efficiency and incident prevention. Meanwhile, Netsurion is priced competitively for its managed services, offering cost-effective solutions with good value, though its price can seem high compared to newer market entrants. QRadar's ROI includes a strong return on investment through its comprehensive features.
With Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks' incident correlation, behavioral detection, and process tree visibility, similar initial triage can often be completed in roughly 10 to 20 minutes, depending on the incident.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
With SOAR, the workflow takes one minute or less to complete the analysis.
AWS gives the chance to implement a solution out of the box with use cases that are already in IBM Security QRadar.
Investing this amount was very much worth it for my organization.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
They assist with advanced issues, such as hardware or other problems, that are not part of standard operations.
Support needs to understand the issue first, then escalate it to the engineering team.
The support is really good; for instance, if a critical ticket is submitted, you will get paged right away as it gets logged, and their analyst will look into it, letting you know as soon as possible so you can work on it.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
For EPS license, if you increase or exceed the EPS license, you cannot receive events.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
On cloud, you don't see any disconnections or instability.
I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs.
The product has been stable so far.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
When a Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks incident is confirmed, it would be useful to automatically create a ServiceNow or Jira ticket with the incident summary, including affected endpoints, user indicators, process tree, severity, and recommended response actions.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
We receive logs from different types of devices and need a way to correlate them effectively.
If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules.
IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
It was costly mainly because of the value you can get right now compared to other solutions.
It depends on how much you want to spend.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Recently, I faced an incident, a cyber incident, and it was detected in real time.
IBM Security QRadar gives the opportunity to improve the time to market of the releases with a great evaluation of cybersecurity breaches.
Compared to ArcSight, Splunk, or any other SIEM tools where you need their processing language such as structured query language, SPL, and in Sentinel there is KQL query languages, IBM Security QRadar doesn't require reliance on query languages.



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 93 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 39 |
| Large Enterprise | 107 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.
IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.
What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.
Netsurion offers real-time alerts, weekly reports, and a user-friendly interface, facilitating security event visibility and threat detection. Its capabilities include seamless platform integration, quick setup, 24/7 SOC monitoring, and fast data retrieval via Elasticsearch.
Netsurion enhances IT security by providing centralized log management, abnormal activity alerts, and compliance reports. Users often employ it for VPN monitoring, firewall scrutiny, and vulnerability assessment. The system's frequent updates ensure effective cybersecurity management, while its managed SOC service supports ongoing threat monitoring and response. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in interface simplicity, report generation speed, and search functionalities.
What are Netsurion's key features?Netsurion is implemented across diverse industries to provide comprehensive security monitoring and compliance management. Companies use it to gather and analyze log data, manage firewall activities, assess vulnerabilities, and facilitate event logging. This aids in enhancing security posture and ensuring compliance with industry standards.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.