Netskope Advanced Analytics vs Safeguard by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Netskope and One Identity are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. Netskope is ranked #30, while One Identity is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Netskope holds a 1.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to One Identity’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Netskope users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Netskope Advanced Analytics

Read 1 Netskope Advanced Analytics review

910 Views
564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 90 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,011 Views
2,533 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Netskope Advanced Analytics

Safeguard by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Netskope Advanced Analytics are competing products in identity management and cloud security, respectively. Users benefit from One Identity Safeguard's superior support and price satisfaction, whereas Netskope Advanced Analytics is recognized for its comprehensive feature set, justifying its price.

Features: One Identity Safeguard includes strong access control, efficient threat detection, and reliable identity governance. Netskope Advanced Analytics offers extensive visibility, control over cloud activities, and prioritizes real-time data protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard features a straightforward deployment process with dependable customer service. Netskope Advanced Analytics enhances scalability with its cloud-based solutions, though initial deployment can be complex. Its customer relationship management is extensive.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard often presents a more favorable setup cost with consistent ROI on identity-related investments. Netskope Advanced Analytics, though potentially higher in setup costs, delivers ROI through long-term benefits in cloud security and analytical insights.

To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,839 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Netskope Advanced Analytics

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

30th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Netskope Advanced Analytics is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	2.8%
Netskope Advanced Analytics	1.2%
Other	96.0%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Shiv Ram

Senior Manager at Bharti Airtel Limited

User-friendly experience and customization of workflow with certain scripting challenges

Netskope could benefit from enhancements in its scripting capabilities. While they offer numerous predefined templates, there are instances where customers may require customized templates to meet specific requirements. Creating these templates often involves scripting, which can include algorithms and logical expressions. Many end-users and customers may not possess the necessary knowledge to develop these scripts, making it challenging. Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides comprehensive reports, including predefined templates tailored for compliance requirements, making it easier to present detailed information to customers."

"It provides secure and centralized access to both on-prem and cloud servers, which we did not have before. Previously, there were myriad ways to access our servers, so this centralizing feature is beneficial."

"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"The integration of One Identity Safeguard has had a clear positive impact on both security and operational efficiency, with earlier estimates showing thirty to forty percent fewer password-related tickets and fifty percent faster audit preparation, along with reducing risk and eliminating shared credentials."

"I have seen a clear return on investment with One Identity Safeguard, reducing manual effort for access management by around thirty to forty percent, decreasing audit preparation time by nearly fifty percent, and lowering the risks of costly incidents through improved security controls."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable."

"I give it an eight because of its robust security features, its splendid automated password management, and real-time activity monitoring that stood out to me."

"We were able to take an environment where we had several hosts managed by different people and consolidate that into a single, centrally managed solution."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

Cons

"Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible."

"We have issues using Safeguard to record http/https connection in a video format. Currently, they don't have a mechanism to record this type of connection."

"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this."

"The user interface can be improved for better searching of user accounts, and if One Identity enhances its support in that area, it would be very helpful."

"Reporting and dashboard customization with One Identity Safeguard should be better improved."

"One feature that I feel One Identity Safeguard lacks is a robust reporting interface, as the data we get from it is not very well displayed."

"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

"I think the initial setup of One Identity Safeguard could be more simplified, and the dashboard customization could also be improved."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing largely depends on the specific customer."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,839 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	88
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

Our experience with the pricing and licensing was generally positive. The initial setup costs were reasonable considering the security and access control benefits we are getting. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

I think Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the user interface a little simpler and more intuitive, especially for new administrators. Some configurations and advanced features ta...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is to manage a secure privileged account and access a critical system. It helps us to control who can access sensitive resources and monitor privilege...

See all answers

Comparisons

Exabeam vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 36% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

Adlumin Security Operations vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

More Netskope Advanced Analytics Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Haystax Analytics Platform vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

August 2026

Download Netskope Advanced Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

August 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Overview

Netskope Advanced Analytics provides deep visibility and insights into cloud activities and security for businesses. It enables organizations to monitor and act upon data intelligently, enhancing security measures.

By leveraging advanced data analytics, Netskope Advanced Analytics delivers comprehensive visibility into cloud, web, and private application activities. It supports data-driven decision-making, allowing for proactive security measures and efficient response strategies. The intuitive interface simplifies data interpretation, enhancing the ability to act on insights quickly.

What are the key features of Netskope Advanced Analytics?

Comprehensive Dashboard: Offers a centralized view of cloud and web activity.
Data Correlation: Integrates data from multiple sources for cohesive analysis.
Customizable Reporting: Allows users to tailor reports to specific needs.
Real-Time Alerts: Instant notifications for suspicious activities.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Provides insights to strengthen security frameworks.
Enhanced Decision Making: Data-driven insights facilitate strategic decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation reducing operational costs.
Scalability: Adapts to evolving business environments easily.

Netskope Advanced Analytics is implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and retail, offering sector-specific insights. It helps healthcare providers protect patient data, finance institutions secure transactions, and retailers safeguard customer information, adapting to each industry's unique challenges.

Netskope

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, Exabeam, IBM and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,839 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.