NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

NETSCOUT and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #35 with an average rating of 10.0, while PICO is ranked #74. NETSCOUT holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Read 6 NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE reviews

633 Views
627 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,134 Views
975 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Pico Corvil Analytics and NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE compete in the network performance monitoring and analytics market. Recent data indicates that NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE might have an edge due to its extensive feature set, although Pico Corvil stands out for its cost-effectiveness and superior support.

Features: Pico Corvil provides real-time data analytics, offering detailed network visibility and precision. Its forensic capabilities allow for in-depth analysis of network issues. Alternatively, NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE includes strong synthetic testing, enabling proactive monitoring and alerting for potential disruptions, which assists in preemptive issue resolution.

Room for Improvement: Pico Corvil could enhance its synthetic testing to match its data analytics strength. It may also consider expanding its feature set for more comprehensive monitoring and increase automation capabilities. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE could improve its forensic analysis depth, refine its cost structure for more immediate affordability, and enhance customer support for more accessible assistance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pico Corvil offers a streamlined deployment process and robust customer support, facilitating quick installation with minimal disruption. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE also delivers an intuitive deployment experience focusing on speed and ease. Despite both products offering effective setups, Pico Corvil is often recognized for stronger customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Pico Corvil is recognized for competitive upfront costs, leading to higher perceived ROI, attractive for budget-conscious buyers. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE, while potentially having higher initial costs, offers long-term ROI through its advanced capabilities and preventative monitoring, often seen as justifying the expense.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Leandro Di Maria

Gerente De Ventas at internet winds ag

Offers real-time monitoring capabilities, which help businesses optimize their operations

The tools are part of managed environments, but when the capabilities of the routers need to be increased, we use NETSCOUT to manage things at an international level. The tool's user interface is okay. It would be great if the tool could provide alerts during attacks in Spanish. In the next release, if the traffic analysis could send our company an alert before an attack starts, it would be even better. Before an attack starts, seeing the traffic behavior and activities would be great. The tool should also share alerts since it is an area where the product has certain shortcomings.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a very reliable and complete solution for troubleshooting and monitoring environments."

"I like the single pane of glass view because it presents everything in one window, obviously. You can see it all. With a quick glance, you get a pretty good snapshot of what's going on in a particular situation."

"The most valuable feature of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is the network troubleshooting analysis. You can pinpoint an issue before it could shut down the network."

"I like the single pane of glass view. I like being able to go to one place instead of having to hunt around for everything."

"The most valuable features of this solution are monitoring and maintaining traffic queuing, as well as seeing who is using the bandwidth."

"The solution's technical support team consists of good engineers and technicians."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"We're able to quickly drill down and find answers to events that are happening in real-time, using Corvil's analytics tools. That's the feature which is most in the spotlight..."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"Before an attack starts, seeing the traffic behavior and activities would be great. The tool should also share alerts since it is an area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"They require a lot of manual effort as traffic flows, networks, and formal times change."

"The GUI interface and dashboards could be more attractive to the customer."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"Usability is the area with the biggest room for improvement. We've found that with NETSCOUT, while it's a fantastic product, the usability is a major factor because there are just way too many clicks. It's obvious, from our experience, that the people who are developing the product aren't using it."

"In terms of additional features, I would like to see better event notification. Right now, we put in an email address to receive an alert and it receives every event and every alert that comes out. We need something a little more granular."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"I have seen errors where the CNE and the CMC haven't synced because of something missing in the CMC, which was there in the CNE. We would get some type of error, but it doesn't actually say what exactly was missing in the CNE."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is high. The other solutions are less expensive but we cannot depend on the other solutions, they are not as stable."

"Cost is contracted on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost beyond the standard licensing."

"The tool's price is okay. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it as a five, where one means it is not expensive, and ten means it is the most expensive."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

56%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

The tool's price is okay. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it as a five, where one means it is not expensive, and ten means it is the most expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

I use the solution in my company to analyze international traffic.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 27% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 27% of the time

Checkmk vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 13% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 11% of the time

Centreon vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 11% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 31% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

July 2025

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

nGeniusPULSE

Corvil

Overview

NETSCOUT’s nGeniusPULSE delivers the visibility needed into today’s evolving IT eco-system to ensure the availability, reliability, and performance of your mission-critical business services across your multi-cloud environment, from wherever users need access.

NETSCOUT

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Banco Votorantim

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Free Report: NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.