NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

NETSCOUT and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #78, while PICO is ranked #74. NETSCOUT holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

562 Views
556 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,134 Views
975 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Pico Corvil Analytics and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competing products in network analytics and management, focusing on visibility and performance insights. Pico Corvil Analytics gains attention for cost efficiency, whereas NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG appears more robust with a comprehensive feature set, appealing to those investing in enhanced capabilities.

Features: Pico Corvil Analytics delivers real-time data insights, supports various protocols, and combines speed with efficiency in analysis. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG offers advanced packet decoding, high-fidelity forensic analysis, and detailed network troubleshooting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Pico Corvil Analytics could enhance its high-fidelity forensic features, expand protocol support, and deepen its analytical detail. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may improve its deployment process, real-time analytical speed, and cost efficiency to cater to a broader range of businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pico Corvil Analytics has a simplified deployment process suitable for rapid setup, with responsive customer service. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG requires a more involved deployment due to an intricate system configuration but benefits from extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Pico Corvil Analytics is noted for lower initial setup costs, offering an attractive return on investment for cost-effective solutions. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG requires a substantial upfront investment but justifies it with sophisticated analytics and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."

"The product is stable. I have never had any issue where we have lost an InfiniStream, or visibility from that particular InfiniStream, throughout the bank."

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

"It is very rock solid. We hardly have any hardware issues."

"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."

"It allows us to get quicker resolutions. We can see exactly what is using up the bandwidth, so we can assist end users."

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"With the Corvil Stored Data Analyzer module, we can use it for test data or a set of production data to set up the configuration for latency setup, so we can use the fields to correlate messages."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

"The single pane of glass feed still needs work."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"I have seen errors where the CNE and the CMC haven't synced because of something missing in the CMC, which was there in the CNE. We would get some type of error, but it doesn't actually say what exactly was missing in the CNE."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"The price is a little high."

"This product could be cheaper."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

56%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Comparisons

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 28% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 25% of the time

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 18% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 15% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 14% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

June 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Corvil

Overview

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

U.S. Department of Defense

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Free Report: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.