NetApp StorageGRID vs VAST Data comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetApp Logo
3,464 views|2,637 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
VAST Data Logo
1,519 views|1,075 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetApp StorageGRID and VAST Data based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed File and Object Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has awesome scalability. We consume it with storage appliance nodes, then we just plug and play as we need more.""The most valuable feature is tiering.""It has improved our operational efficiency through time consumption and logistics by 40 to 50 percent. Everything that had to do with our legacy tape solution has been improved and is now more efficient.""The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods.""Cost-effective and easy to deploy.""It helps automate our storage infrastructure.""Right now, we have an older StorageGRID. I like that we can grow it.""It has enabled us to save money on storage costs. We removed our tape library."

More NetApp StorageGRID Pros →

"This has been one of the most reliable storage systems that I have ever used.""The solution is useful for machine learning and scientific applications, including computer simulations."

More VAST Data Pros →

Cons
"The processes around installation and upgrade need improvement.""The integration with more apps has room for improvement.""Data retrieval speed could be better.""Beyond the initial setup, this product is a little bit difficult to configure.""We want to move towards Azure in the cloud. Right now, the system is all physical.""Improvements need to be made in the support area.""The only real issue that we have run into is, when we are cloning, we cannot do a thin provision clone, it has to be a full clone.""One key improvement I'd like to see in StorageGRID is enhanced visibility for management purposes."

More NetApp StorageGRID Cons →

"The write performance could be improved because it is less than half of the read performance.""The read/write ratio is an area in the solution with some flaws and needs improvement."

More VAST Data Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is attractive."
  • "We chose NetApp because of price and performance."
  • "While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better."
  • "The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure."
  • "We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service."
  • "Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud."
  • "Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."
  • "NetApp is not known for being the cheapest storage option on the market. Almost all of the other storage options we looked at were less expensive than StorageGRID. The price is one thing to criticize, which is what we hear internally and from customers as well. They find the cost of the terabytes in this class of storage a little bit higher than expected."
  • More NetApp StorageGRID Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We acquired VAST Data as a one-time, capital purchase."
  • "Price-wise, VAST Data is not the cheapest, not the most expensive one."
  • More VAST Data Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The feature of StorageGRID that I find most valuable for ensuring data durability and protection is its Information Lifecycle Management functionality.
    Top Answer:The pricing of StorageGRID falls within the typical range for enterprise-grade solutions and is comparable to other vendors such as Dell, NetApp, and Pure Storage. There's no significant difference in… more »
    Top Answer:NetApp StorageGRID, like AWS S3, adheres to standards for decoupling data from metadata. However, the product faces challenges in this area, particularly concerning the storage of metadata. Unlike… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is useful for machine learning and scientific applications, including computer simulations.
    Top Answer:Price-wise, VAST Data is not the cheapest, not the most expensive one.
    Top Answer:The read/write ratio is an area in the solution with some flaws and needs improvement.
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    3,464
    Comparisons
    2,637
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    672
    Rating
    8.4
    12th
    Views
    1,519
    Comparisons
    1,075
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Storage GRID
    Learn More
    Overview

    Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

    Innovation to break decades of data storage trade-offs.

    Sample Customers
    ASE, DARZ GmbH
    Norwest Venture Partners, General Dynamics Information Technology, Ginkgo Bioworks
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    University13%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    University6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    File and Object Storage
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 7th in File and Object Storage with 12 reviews while VAST Data is ranked 12th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.4, while VAST Data is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "Scalable object storage with robust data durability with efficient geo-distribution and comprehensive lifecycle management ensuring managing of large volumes of unstructured data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VAST Data writes "Stability-wise, a device that has been up and running for years". NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with MinIO, Dell ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Scality RING and Cloudian HyperStore, whereas VAST Data is most compared with Pure Storage FlashBlade, NetApp AFF, Pure Storage FlashArray, Qumulo and Dell PowerScale (Isilon).

    See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

    We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.