No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NAVEX One vs ServiceNow comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NAVEX One
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
GRC (24th), IT Governance (14th), IT Vendor Risk Management (12th)
ServiceNow
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
231
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (1st), IT Asset Management (1st), IT Service Management (ITSM) (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (2nd), No-Code Development Platforms (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

NAVEX One and ServiceNow aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. NAVEX One is designed for GRC and holds a mindshare of 1.5%, up 1.3% compared to last year.
ServiceNow, on the other hand, focuses on IT Service Management (ITSM), holds 12.7% mindshare, down 21.0% since last year.
GRC Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NAVEX One1.5%
RSA Archer6.2%
MetricStream3.2%
Other89.1%
GRC
IT Service Management (ITSM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ServiceNow12.7%
JIRA Service Management6.4%
BMC Helix ITSM5.2%
Other75.7%
IT Service Management (ITSM)
 

Featured Reviews

EV
Information Security Business Enablement Mgr. at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Useful for risk assessment and has customization capability
The tool helps us with security incidents, policies, business continuity, disaster recovery, and internal audits. The feature I like the most is its customization capability. It acts like a blank canvas where you can construct forms and workflows according to your needs. You can configure and customize a lot yourself, whether starting from scratch or using some out-of-the-box options. The solution has impacted our operations by helping us manage and prioritize environmental risks. It also assists in establishing ownership of risks and enables us to mitigate or mediate existing risks. Additionally, it facilitates tracking risks throughout their entire lifecycle.
Hemanthreddy Vakiti - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Structured workflows have improved SLA compliance and now support prioritized incident handling
I think the licensing and pricing of ServiceNow is quite expensive compared to other tools. For large organizations, it is acceptable, but specifically for small and medium organizations to track incidents or change requests, ServiceNow is quite expensive. Sometimes performance can be slow when workflows and integrations are configured for complex tasks. For advanced customizations or advanced features which we rarely use, the documentation is not up to standard. The documentation needs to be improved for advanced customization features. However, the platform is stable overall and the features are quite good. The user experience and performance concerns I mentioned are areas I want to be improved. When many workflows and interactions are configured, performance is slow. For the features it is providing, it is quite expensive. If these performance features are improved, we can easily pay that price and get the return on investment.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool helps us with security incidents, policies, business continuity, disaster recovery, and internal audits. The feature I like the most is its customization capability. It acts like a blank canvas where you can construct forms and workflows according to your needs. You can configure and customize a lot yourself, whether starting from scratch or using some out-of-the-box options."
"Now, ServiceNow is a leader and its pricing is quite good, quite competitive."
"Great that it's knowledge-based and you can use the flows in ServiceNow."
"Go ahead and get it. You'll have a cleaner insight into your organization, and how it's really working."
"We used ServiceNow for change management, release management, and event management."
"As time has gone on and ServiceNow has evolved and matured, we are loving the ease of the product."
"Last year, there were three steps for installing or uninstalling software when a user asked us to do so, but by using ServiceNow, when a user opens a ticket or incident, we can automatically run the workflows through the system, and the assistant can automatically go to the user's computer and install or uninstall the software."
"ServiceNow is a cloud solution. That fact was very important for us, that it is not an on-prem solution, as it reduces our internal cost of support."
"ServiceNow reduces drastically the time to value and it is possible to completely get rid of flat files such as spreadsheets and powerpoints in less than a month for any Organizational process."
 

Cons

"We think there's room for improvement, especially with customizing NAVEX One. Their development on the roadmap can be slow."
"Upgrades through the years have been pretty tough."
"Before implementing this solution, you should have the ITSM model in place for change management requests. That is a prerequisite because you cannot perform tasks without it."
"The solution's user experience could be improved concerning its UI and portals."
"The visual representation of the data is an area where they fall short of, but they do have a partner who is native to their product that does a much better job visualizing the data."
"Calendar views - there are no nice calendar views and I think I'm just starting to learn about resource management but it would be nice for them to have the roadmaps so you can see an actual calendar view to see where, from a project, you are."
"The utilization of AI in ServiceNow needs enhancement."
"The interface requires an upgrade."
"It would be nice if we could, with some specific access rights, move histories from one squad to another, as they generate dependencies or duplicate or flag them."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NAVEX One's pricing comes in the middle range when compared to other products."
"The price could be a little lower for the solution. Many of my customers have issues with the licensing process, they have to make it easier and straightforward."
"Certainly, from a product-platform perspective, the price is not too bad."
"This is a pretty expensive product, so the licensing could be better."
"The solution is priced for medium to enterprises sized businesses. However, it is expensive compared to competitors."
"The price is okay for us. It's reasonable."
"The solution is expensive."
"I have found the solution very expensive."
"The price of this solution is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business57
Midsize Enterprise35
Large Enterprise179
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow?
ServiceNow operates on a subscription-based pricing model with custom pricing based on modules, users, and business requirements. Pricing varies depending on modules such as ITSM and ITOM, and lice...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Lockpath Keylight
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Claims Recovery Financial Services (CRFS), Surescript, The University of Chicago
AAA, AstraZeneca, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Broadcom, Christus Health, Epicor, Equinix, GE Capital, Intuit, KPMG, Loyola Marymount University, OshKosh, Quantas, RedHat, Royal Bank of Scotland, Swiss Re, U.S. Department of Energy, Safeway, Yale University, and Zillow    
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, MetricStream, Diligent and others in GRC. Updated: September 2026.
915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.