Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

N-able N-sight RMM vs TeamViewer Remote Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

N-able N-sight RMM
Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
17th
Average Rating
5.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamViewer Remote Management
Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of N-able N-sight RMM is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer Remote Management is 2.2%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
 

Featured Reviews

Adrian Glass - PeerSpot reviewer
Console enhancements needed for better driver updates and registry checks with prompt antivirus alerts
N-able N-sight should improve its console functionality. It lacks features for updating drivers, clearing up storage, and conducting registry checks from the console. Additionally, it should provide more detailed notifications and instructions for addressing deployment issues. The system should also allow for remote resolution of issues rather than requiring physical access to the machines.
Babawale Awojinrin - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows the incorporation of systems and integration of remote systems
The initial setup is straightforward and requires three to five minutes. It starts with determining the PC's architecture (64-bit or 32-bit), leading the user to know which version to download. Additionally, there are a number of factors that need to be considered like the number of technical users for remote access, the number of remote locations, and storage requirements. These factors will guide the user license purchase. We should always factor in costs, and there's potential for offering more accessible pricing, especially in markets like Africa and developing countries, given their business environment. On the other hand, there have been challenges stemming from the transition; the previous owners used a free tool like NGINX for remote operations. Transitioning to a paid remote tool is driven by security and enhanced features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The antivirus feature is valuable as it notifies us of infections and allows us to address them promptly."
"I've left Splashtop running for seven or eight hours connected to a system. I've left TeamViewer running for seven or eight hours to a connection or two. I have a hard time working out on four computers at a time, but three is not impossible for me. So even if I've had three computers connected it has been fairly stable."
"There are some great features."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use. Using this solution enables us to get support easily."
"It's stable and reliable."
"TeamViewer Remote Management is easy to use and user-friendly."
"The most recent enhancements are quite remarkable."
"Almost all the features are valuable to me, like the scalable feature and its highly interactive software."
"One of the most valuable features has been that it's a remote tool. I think this is a particularly good tool, and it's user-friendly."
 

Cons

"N-able N-sight should improve its console functionality."
"It could be more secure."
"There should be an enterprise version of the solution."
"The connectivity could improve."
"The main issue with the solution is the stability problem arising from network issues."
"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."
"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."
"I want TeamViewer Remote Management to incorporate more integrations."
"One of the defects that I have noticed with TeamViewer Remote Management is that if I am on a certain version and the person to whom I am connected is not on the same version, then it does not connect at times until I update the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We spend around 3500 rands monthly for services covering seven servers and approximately 150 machines. However, maintenance and support require an additional cost."
"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."
"Addition services could be lower priced."
"I have used the free version of the solution."
"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."
"The solution's license is expensive."
"It is a licensed product."
"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."
"The solution relies on cloud-based infrastructure so the price is tailored to each individual model used"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able N-sight RMM?
We spend around 3500 rands monthly for services covering seven servers and approximately 150 machines. However, maintenance and support require an additional cost.
What needs improvement with N-able N-sight RMM?
N-able N-sight should improve its console functionality. It lacks features for updating drivers, clearing up storage, and conducting registry checks from the console. Additionally, it should provid...
What is your primary use case for N-able N-sight RMM?
We primarily utilize N-able N-sight for remote monitoring, ongoing protection, and providing remote access for both our organization and clients.
What do you like most about TeamViewer Remote Management?
The fact that it's user-friendly and it has a chat option. These are my two favorite features.
What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. This is a great tool for remote access and communication since it's very reliable.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Carey Paul Honda
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya, NinjaOne, N-able and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM). Updated: June 2025.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.