N-able EDR vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

N-able and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #52 with an average rating of 7.0, while WatchGuard is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 4 N-able EDR reviews

699 Views
671 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 35 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

4,776 Views
2,913 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

N-able EDR and WatchGuard EPDR are popular endpoint protection solutions. WatchGuard EPDR is considered superior due to its features and users feel it is worth the price.

Features: N-able EDR offers comprehensive threat intelligence, seamless integration, and easy-to-use dashboards. WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced machine learning capabilities, real-time threat detection, and granular policy setup.

Room for Improvement: N-able EDR users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, a more granular policy configuration, and offline threat protection. WatchGuard EPDR users recommend improvements in performance impact, offline protection, and a more user-friendly interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N-able EDR is favored for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer service. WatchGuard EPDR is noted for its complex setup process but reliable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: N-able EDR users find it cost-effective with a satisfactory return on investment. WatchGuard EPDR users feel it provides good value despite higher setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

52nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"We have been using this solution for quite some time, and the AI functionality is quite advanced; we are able to provide insights on different aspects and read the reports easily."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It prevents our users from circumventing security. Everything is password protected so they can't get into it. They can't uninstall it. They can't do anything."

"It offers an easy initial setup."

"The most valuable feature of Panda Security Adaptive Defense is we don't have to have dedicated infrastructure on-premise because it is cloud-based."

"The EDR has a high accuracy rate with only a few false positives."

"I've found it's got excellent web protection."

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

"I like the Panda Security Adaptive Defense cloud usages. Everything is on a single plane of glass like the dashboards. I also like the information I can get about the computers itself."

"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"Occasionally, we suffer from little bugs that give us the wrong message."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense can improve by including the intrusion and prevention system not only on their most expensive platform. Additionally, it blocks software that is legitimate from users. They complain and then we have to manually unblock the software, by hash, or we receive a message. Some of the prevention features are not available and this might cause us to need a separate firewall or something to protect the company."

"They could have more reports."

"We do get the odd false positive when we're trying to install the software."

"I would like to see better data protection."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

"t would help if it would monitor the network better."

"Only the DNS filtering part could be improved, and nothing else apart from this needs correction."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

"The product is available at a high price."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

I think the pricing is normal because we subscribe for three years. Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 26% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 25% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 17% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.