MuleSoft Composer vs Stitch comparison

Salesforce and Qlik are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qlik is ranked #25 with an average rating of 5.0. Salesforce holds a 1.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to Qlik’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
511 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Stitch

Read 5 Stitch reviews

506 Views
268 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Stitch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 18, 2025

Stitch and MuleSoft Composer are competing in data integration. MuleSoft Composer tends to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and robust integration capabilities.

Features: Stitch includes reliable data integration tools, easy data extraction, and scalability. MuleSoft Composer offers extensive pre-built connectors, advanced integration features, and the ability to effectively integrate complex ecosystems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer provides a flexible deployment model and strong customer support, facilitating smooth integration. Stitch, while simpler to deploy, may lack the detailed support and flexibility needed for complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Stitch is known for its cost-effectiveness and favorable ROI for budget-conscious businesses. MuleSoft Composer, although more expensive, delivers a higher ROI for those requiring comprehensive functionality and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. Stitch Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Stitch

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Stitch

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stitch is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	1.6%
Stitch	1.2%
Other	97.2%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2783532

Cloud Data Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Improved data management has reduced errors while consistent loads have saved weekly effort

I think the best feature Stitch offers is that it handles deleted records. Stitch's ability to handle deleted records is a standout feature for me because if a record is deleted at the source, I can easily track it with soft delete and all that functionality. Stitch has impacted my organization positively, as I have both positive and negative aspects with it. One positive aspect is that full loads are free, so whenever I see data issues, I can go for full loads. At the same time, I need to look at the limitations, such as API limits. Stitch has helped my organization achieve better data management, making it easier. Better data management means that Stitch helps my team access data faster and reduces errors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"Stitch has helped my organization achieve better data management, making it easier, as it helps my team access data faster and reduces errors."

"Stitch has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to create MVPs quickly."

"The setup process for Stitch was pretty easy, with a plug and play approach where the data is immediately available."

"The most valuable feature of Stitch for us is ease of use. This solution is fire-and-forget. All an organization has to do is set up the connection or integration and move on."

"Stitch helps immensely because in just a day, we are able to cover the work that would normally take two to three weeks worth of design work nonstop."

Cons

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"The conversion to Figma is not effective."

"Generally speaking, support is a pain point. In the next release, I would love to see a change in support from the current chat to a more comprehensive portal."

"The customer support of Stitch is horrible."

"The designs that Stitch produces sometimes cannot really be used for final launch, but I understand Stitch was designed just for rapid prototyping and for teams to get from the point where they just have an idea to having an actual product."

"My experience with customer support for Stitch has been very bad."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Talend Stitch?

I wish Stitch could handle changes and updates to data better. I think improvement is needed in the licensing process.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Talend Stitch?

I have been using Stitch for the last five years. My main use case for Stitch is to ingest SFDC data and also Google Analytics, Facebook Ads, and GA4. I use Stitch as a data ingestion tool for SFDC...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Talend Stitch?

I do not want to add more about the features of Stitch. I do not have any other improvements needed for Stitch that I have not mentioned yet. My advice to others looking into using Stitch is to con...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Fivetran vs Stitch

Compared 55% of the time

AWS Glue vs Stitch

Compared 45% of the time

More Stitch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Stitch

January 2026

Download Stitch product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Talend Stitch ETL

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Stitch is a cloud-based ETL service designed to synchronize data between a variety of sources and destinations, offering robust and scalable data integration capabilities.

Stitch facilitates seamless data integration, providing users with real-time data movement across their tech stack. Its flexible architecture allows easy connectivity between diverse systems and ensures data consistency. With its user-friendly setup, Stitch empowers data teams to efficiently manage complex data workflows, enhancing decision-making and operational efficiency.

What are Stitch's most important features?

Data Extraction: Efficiently extracts data from numerous sources, ensuring smooth data flow across platforms.
Real-Time Data Sync: Offers synchronized data transfer to maintain up-to-date datasets.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs with scalable architecture.
Secure Data Transfer: Implements security practices ensuring data integrity during transfers.
API Access: Provides API connectivity for robust data pipeline customization.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Stitch?

Improved Decision-Making: Enables timely and informed business decisions with real-time data accessibility.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses associated with manual data integration processes.
Increased Productivity: Frees up IT resources by automating data movement, allowing teams to focus on strategic tasks.
Enhanced Data Accuracy: Minimizes errors through automated and consistent data integration processes.

In industries like e-commerce and finance, Stitch is instrumental in integrating data from sales platforms and financial systems to analytics tools. Retailers can combine online and offline sales data, while financial firms streamline data into centralized repositories, ensuring comprehensive analysis and reporting.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AB InBev, Accolade, Accor, AstraZeneca, Beachbody

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Stitch

December 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. Stitch

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. Stitch and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Stitch report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.