MuleSoft API Manager and webMethods.io both compete in the API management and integration platform category. MuleSoft tends to have the upper hand due to its ease of development and strong API management capabilities, as well as its extensive range of connectors.
Features: MuleSoft API Manager provides robust integration capabilities with a wide range of connectors and powerful security features. Users find it easy to use, scalable for cloud and hybrid environments, and stable. WebMethods.io offers a strong suite of features for enterprise scenarios, including unit testing, data mapping, and comprehensive trading network solutions, making it ideal for large-scale deployments.
Room for Improvement: MuleSoft API Manager needs enhancement in analytics, reduced API gateway weight, and better DevOps integration. Users often criticize its high pricing and suggest a clearer product roadmap. WebMethods.io requires improved documentation, better orchestration capabilities, and enhanced support for large deployments. Challenges also include difficulties with version upgrades and legacy system integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft API Manager supports deployment across various environments and is appreciated for its flexibility. While its customer service is generally strong, some users seek clearer initial resolutions. WebMethods.io, focusing on on-premises deployments, has positive feedback regarding its technical support and professional services.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft API Manager is considered expensive, with costs based on the number of cores and fees for premium features. Despite this, its ease of integration offers a good ROI, noted through reduced complexity and process enhancement. WebMethods.io also has complex and high pricing, particularly for full enterprise use, with value tied to its adaptable enterprise capabilities.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year.
MuleSoft is typically more expensive compared to using Java or Spring Boot APIs hosted in containers.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
Mulesoft API Manager is the portion of the Anypoint Platform that is used for the designing, building, managing, and publishing of APIs. Anypoint Platform uses Mule as its core runtime engine.
Mulesoft API Manager is an extremely versatile solution. It offers users the ability to deploy their APIs in a number of different settings. You can use API Manager on a public cloud, a private cloud, or a hybrid. Additionally, users can use the solution to manage their deployments with ease. A few clicks are all you need to alter your deployment.
Benefits of Mulesoft API Manager
Some of the benefits of using Mulesoft API Manager include:
Reviews from Real Users
Mulesoft API Manager is a highly effective piece of software whose purpose is to enable users to design, build, manage, and publish APIs. It stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the ease with which users can connect it to their applications and the high level of value that its support offers. It provides users with the ability to easily connect this solution with whatever program they need to join it with. Users can create connections without having to write code. It offers different types of support which ensure that users have a high level of understanding about the product and how to use it.
PeerSpot user Tolulope A., a technical lead specializing in integration and middleware at a financial services firm, notes the ease with which users can connect Mulesoft API Manager to their applications. He writes, “One good thing about MuleSoft is that they have a lot of connectors to those back-end applications. We don't really need to write code to be able to connect to a database or to connect with SAP. You just need credentials and the connectivity details. Most of the development of what we do is just drag and drop. They're able to connect with applications using standard connectors that are provided by ESB, by MuleSoft.”
The CEO & Co-Founder at a computer retailer notes the value of Mulesoft’s supporting documentation. They write, “The documentation is great; it is always up-to-date and well-presented. If any details are missing, then there is a blog available that contains a lot of details. There are also channels on YouTube to help you better understand the solution and what some of the processes look like.”
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
