We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and SAP Jam based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."
"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."
"The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is the "Alert Me", which provides the ability to set an alert when content is either added or changed and that the alerts can be either real-time or aggregated for the day or the week."
"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very usable. I can navigate it, I can have a media call, I can have a call with my project team, so we can chat with every team kind of like WhatsApp. Any time there are projects or other things, we can chat in a secure way. It's automation-specific secure."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"It's a very robust product."
"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."
"I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications."
"Workflows could be simplified."
"The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account."
"Many of our customers would like to see an OCR feature, so it would be very good to have this in a future release."
"The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration."
"The areas around security, such as protection, need to be included."
"The GUI is outdated."
"Technical support could be improved. They are not fast enough, especially when we'll go deeper in the product itself. More complex issues make it very tough to find someone that can help you."
"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while SAP Jam is ranked 7th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while SAP Jam is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Jam writes "A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HCL Connections, whereas SAP Jam is most compared with SharePoint, Yammer, Adobe Experience Manager and Microsoft 365 Business.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
