We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Verified ID and Okta Customer Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)."I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"The most valuable feature of this solution for most customers is access management."
"The solution has great multifactor authentication."
"The most valuable feature of Okta Customer Identity is its SSO because it's very easy to use and it's user-friendly. Even the admin portal of the solution is very user-friendly, and you can walk through it with ease. Okta Customer Identity is not a complicated solution, and even the workflow automation feature is very, very easy to understand."
"We primarily use it to manage the community onboarding and offboarding of users, and it's quite a simple solution for that."
"It is very seamless."
"We can integrate two-factor authentication with the applications."
"The most valuable features of Okta Customer Identity are there is no infrastructure cost, integrated, has plenty of documentation, and is user-friendly."
"As far as our security team is concerned, the ease of implementing multifactor authentication is definitely the biggest value for our organization."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."
"This solution would be improved by adding biometrics features."
"The product must be provided for free."
"All of the governance functionality and privileged account management could be improved."
"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."
"In the future, we'd like to see the product implement more security features, like, for example, zero-trust."
"The initial setup could be easier to do."
"Users sometimes have difficulty getting verification codes."
Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 7th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 1 review while Okta Customer Identity is ranked 4th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 12 reviews. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0, while Okta Customer Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Customer Identity writes "Ability to work with a wide range of applications and security mechanisms". Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Auth0 and Microsoft Purview, whereas Okta Customer Identity is most compared with ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra External ID, Auth0 and Frontegg.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.
We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
