Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Azure App Service provides cost savings and value through resource reduction and ease of use, enhancing financial outcomes.
Sentiment score
7.8
Organizations using Temenos Quantum report increased development efficiency, cost savings, improved security, seamless integration, and scalable architecture benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Microsoft Azure App Service support is mixed; responses vary, premium plans help, but costs and regional differences impact satisfaction.
Sentiment score
5.7
Temenos Quantum's support is generally helpful with a good ticketing system, but response times and experiences vary.
Regions like Europe, the US, Canada, and India provide very good and immediate support.
Microsoft provides support for a lot of add-on or customized integration requests.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure App Service excels in flexibility and scalability, supporting growth with user-friendly management despite potential infrastructure limitations.
Sentiment score
7.0
Temenos Quantum is praised for scalability and performance, supporting 100-1000 users, despite some complexity concerns compared to Flutter or React.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure App Service is praised for its reliability, though some users experience network issues and occasional testing errors.
Sentiment score
7.5
Temenos Quantum is stable and reliable with frequent updates, but areas like pending applications and front-end need improvement.
I find Microsoft Azure App Service to be quite stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure App Service requires UI clarity, improved scaling, cost management, better support, network integration, and enhanced logging tools.
Temenos Quantum requires security, interface, and stability enhancements, better integration, faster support, flexible widgets, and improved development tools.
Deploying Logic Apps in a private network environment becomes complicated due to the extensive white testing and configurations needed at the networking layer.
Microsoft's support and technical aspects like installation complexity could use enhancement.
We will redefine our logic, and our development and infrastructure teams will discuss and improve the performance of requests and address time-consuming processes.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users of Microsoft Azure App Service experience mixed pricing, with affordability affected by scaling, workload, and regional differences.
Temenos Quantum is costly, with prices ranging from $70,000 to $500,000, though some users find it affordable.
We provide solutions at the optimum minimum cost from start to peak load; the cost is not excessively high but is at a medium level for these solutions.
It is an expensive product, primarily due to the licensing fees.
Pricing is a concern.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure App Service offers scalable, efficient global access with easy deployment, security, and flexible resource management for developers.
Temenos Quantum is valued for its user-friendliness, customizability, integration, security, and comprehensive mobile and web development features.
The best features of Microsoft Azure App Service are its capacity for scalability, security, and basic support functionalities.
The integration capabilities of Microsoft Azure App Service have greatly enhanced my ability to handle global web operations and support various functions, which were previously challenging without such integration.
The product is easy to maintain and deploy.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure App Service
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
4th
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
8th
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
21st
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (3rd), Low-Code Development Platforms (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Mobile Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 4.3%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 4.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Ajit Chandra - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlined development and robust SDK integration with auto and vertical scaling
The main area that requires improvement is the function apps and logic apps, specifically from a VNet integration standpoint. When running in private network configurations, Logic Apps do not fulfill most of the requirements. Deploying Logic Apps in a private network environment becomes complicated due to the extensive white testing and configurations needed at the networking layer.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
37%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
5%
Educational Organization
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?
I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure App Service?
One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process.
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
 

Also Known As

Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.