OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Perfecto comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.0, while Perforce is ranked #5. OpenText holds a 6.0% mindshare in MTT, compared to Perforce’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

4,306 Views
1,636 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

6,166 Views
1,542 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Perfecto and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web compete in the realm of testing solutions for mobile and web applications. Perfecto often has an advantage in terms of ease of setup and ROI, while OpenText provides a richer feature set that justifies its higher costs.

Features: Perfecto offers powerful cloud-based testing capabilities and strong integration with CI/CD tools. It supports comprehensive test coverage, particularly for mobile environments, ensuring robust application testing. OpenText features extensive automation capabilities, a wide range of application support including legacy systems, and strategic integrations with network virtualization to assess real-world application performance.

Room for Improvement: Perfecto could enhance user navigation and reporting functionalities, as well as expanding device and browser compatibility. Improvements in network simulation features would further benefit its offerings. OpenText could simplify its interface to improve the learning curve and enhance integration with non-OpenText applications. There is also room for reducing the complexity of creating test scripts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto provides seamless deployment with effective customer support systems, fitting smoothly into existing workflows. OpenText's deployment is more complex but offers detailed documentation and technical support, aiding businesses in navigating its comprehensive feature set.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto delivers a cost-effective pricing strategy, appealing to businesses seeking high ROI with cost efficiency. OpenText, priced higher, compensates with extensive features that promise greater ROI in intricate testing scenarios, making it a suitable choice for more demanding testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Perfecto

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,043 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Perfecto

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 6.0%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 6.7%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	6.0%
Perfecto	6.7%
Other	87.3%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using the existing enterprise tools, like UFT, or even if you want to go open source, you can use them and it's a real user-functional performance, we are able to achieve that."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The product is easy to use."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"Perfecto is a game-changer for us, we save at least $10,000 monthly."

"It saves on the cost and effort of having to maintain our own virtual testing environment. Even our onshore team is not in the city that we work in, so that helps a lot. Even if we didn't invest a lot in getting multiple devices, having to share those devices would become a hassle."

"The quality of our software has improved since we implemented this solution."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides, as we are able to quickly scale up the devices and choose Android devices, web-based applications, or whatever we need, and we can scale up quickly and easily."

"Overall, it results in huge cost savings for our company."

"Overall, it's a great solution."

"The CI dashboard tool is very good, as is the Live Stream monitoring. Whenever I want to monitor execution, I can open multiple tabs in Perfecto and it is easy for me to refer to the CI dashboard and the Live Stream."

"Being able to run automated tests and see the success and failure rate of those runs every day has saved us a lot of time and helped us identify issues much sooner, which has improved the quality of our software."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"It is slow compared to physical device testing. The interactive speed could be improved."

"There could be some improvements done on the interface. At times, there has been a bit of a struggle when finding things on the interface. A UI revamp would be a better option in future. That UI hasn't changed much in a long time, so I think they could just make it a bit better so that people could find stuff easily and intuitively."

"We've had a couple of issues lately with videos not loading or browsers dying after some execution, although that happens very rarely."

"I'm hoping they can support on-premises instances."

"We don't use Perforce's BlazeMeter with Perfecto. From my perspective, it's not really relevant."

"When using devices on the cloud, it lags quite a bit at times. I know that these are real devices that are being projected on our laptop screens and monitors, but if the speed could be improved, that would be good."

"On the analytics side, Perfecto is in need of improvement."

"Previously, we used the cradle. Every time the mobile was blocking it, we would have to ask Perfecto to provide another one. That took a lot of time away from us."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

HeadSpin vs Perfecto

Compared 3% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

October 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

October 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Perfecto

October 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.