OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #15. OpenText holds a 9.6% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 45 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

2,909 Views
2,531 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,432 Views
329 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText Core Performance Engineering compete in the performance testing category. Oracle gains an advantage with its strong integration with Oracle applications and its automation capabilities, while LoadRunner Cloud excels in scalability and user satisfaction.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides comprehensive automation and performance testing benefits, especially for Oracle ERP, with integrated solutions like Oracle Functional Test and Oracle Load Test. These capabilities allow testing across Oracle applications and web platforms. LoadRunner Cloud, without the same level of integration, features scalability and ease of use, supporting a wide array of protocols and offering robust load testing with minimal setup time.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite faces challenges with object identification and browser compatibility issues, especially with Internet Explorer. It would benefit from enhanced integration with external tools and improved reporting dashboards. LoadRunner Cloud needs better custom reporting options, improved network latency simulations, and solutions for backward compatibility with older scripts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite primarily offers on-premises deployment with limited cloud capabilities, leading to extended implementation times. However, its technical support is praised for being comprehensive and accessible. LoadRunner Cloud, as a public cloud solution, allows rapid deployment, high scalability, and easy maintenance, though it can demand significant ongoing licensing investments. Its customer support is viewed as less consistent compared to Oracle's strong service profile.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is seen as cost-effective, especially when paired with other Oracle products, potentially reducing expenses for enterprises significantly invested in Oracle environments. It offers a strong ROI by reducing dependency on external licenses. Conversely, LoadRunner Cloud operates on a pay-per-use model that, while saving on infrastructure setup costs, tends to be more expensive, reflecting its wide protocol support and cloud-based benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

15th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 9.6%, up from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive

I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"It is feature-rich. It supports most protocols, which is important because I am in charge of a team at the bank, and we do performance testing for all kinds of different applications. We have tons of them. We even do video streams."

"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."

"The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads."

"It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users."

"The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool."

"I rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud ten out of ten."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"The solution is scalable."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Improvements to the reporting would be good."

"One area for improvement in LoadRunner Cloud, especially for agile models, is its limited support for functional testing alongside its robust non-functional testing capabilities."

"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too."

"It should have a feature to report with a 99.9 percentile success rate."

"Their documentation is not technical enough for us. We would like to have much deeper technical documentation so that we can self-serve without constantly having to go back to them and ask."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"The product price could be more affordable."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"The solution is expensive."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 22% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 33% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

June 2025

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

June 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

OATS

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.