Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 6.8% |
| Jira | 11.0% |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 9.5% |
| Other | 72.7% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SmartBear TestComplete | 5.8% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 11.0% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.0% |
| Other | 76.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.
SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.
What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
