

OpenText Application Quality Management and Microsoft Azure DevOps compete in the software development and quality management category. Microsoft Azure DevOps seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities and competitive pricing.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides detailed test management with capabilities like test case modular storage, defect linkage, and robust traceability. It is known for its QA cycle monitoring. Microsoft Azure DevOps offers a comprehensive toolset for managing the entire software development lifecycle, including seamless integration across platforms and support for multiple coding languages.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management could improve by reducing high licensing costs, enhancing flexibility in license management, and better integration with agile processes. Enhancements to its UI are also needed. Microsoft Azure DevOps could refine its interface, improve built-in reporting, and enhance traceability. Better cross-platform integration is also suggested.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management is typically deployed on-premises or via private cloud, often requiring complex setups. Its customer support is rated fair, but some users report longer response times. Microsoft Azure DevOps prefers a public cloud model, offering agile and scalable deployment. It generally receives favorable feedback for quick customer support, although experiences vary.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management is noted for its high licensing costs, which may limit accessibility for smaller organizations. Users desire more features for the price. Microsoft Azure DevOps provides competitive pricing, especially beneficial for small teams, with flexible user scaling. Both platforms show ROI through time savings, but Azure DevOps is praised for its cost-effectiveness compared to competitors.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
There has been a measurable improvement in productivity of around 40 to 50% after implementing Microsoft Azure DevOps, which has allowed more time to be spent on other things.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
When requirements arise, they are raised and often get fixed within one or two days.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
I would rate technical support from Microsoft for Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable, with multiple options available to scale up the product as needed, given its Microsoft backing.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
Its stability might be attributed to its legacy as an on-premise solution that has been in development for more than 25 years.
There was just one time when there was some infrastructure issue from Microsoft's side, so we faced some glitches for a few minutes only, not for hours or a day.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely stable, as it is available most of the time, with very few downtimes.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Out of the box, the solution is effective, yet with advancements in AI, it has the potential to be more intuitive.
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
Azure charges only the parking cost, not for unnecessary or unwanted cost.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
Whenever something is created or deployed, it automatically triggers the automated scripts, generates reports, and updates the test cases, providing a seamless end-to-end activity.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 9.5% |
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 6.5% |
| Other | 84.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 28 |
| Large Enterprise | 68 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 160 |
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers full cycle integration with CI/CD pipelines and a user-friendly interface. It streamlines development processes and supports Agile planning, making it a versatile choice for teams focusing on software development and project management.
Azure DevOps is designed to enhance productivity with its comprehensive project management features, including task management and backlog organization. It supports automation, agile methodologies, and provides seamless integration with Microsoft products. Despite its robust functionalities, users suggest enhancements in customization, integration with external platforms like GitHub and Office 365, as well as advancements in reporting and dashboard functionalities. Azure DevOps plays a key role in CI/CD workflows, code repository management, work item tracking, and test automation, promoting collaboration across distributed teams.
What are the key features of Microsoft Azure DevOps?Microsoft Azure DevOps is widely implemented in industries focusing on software development and IT project management. It is specifically suitable for organizations that prioritize continuous integration, agile practices, and cross-team collaboration. Companies leverage Azure DevOps for managing code repositories, automating builds, and tracking work items, ensuring efficient project delivery in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.