Mezmo vs NetCrunch comparison

Mezmo and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Log Management category. Mezmo is ranked #52, while AdRem Software is ranked #70. Mezmo holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

520 Views
447 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

593 Views
101 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mezmo

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Mezmo are competitive solutions in the network monitoring category. Mezmo seems to have an advantage owing to its extensive analytics and integration capabilities, which elevate it as a preference for complex data management solutions.

Features: NetCrunch offers a wide range of monitoring options, custom dashboards, and configurability, facilitating adaptability across different network environments. Mezmo provides robust data aggregation, visualization tools, and seamless integration, making it suitable for intricate data environments with versatile needs.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch can improve its alerting mechanisms and make configurations more intuitive, while Mezmo could enhance initial implementation support and improve documentation clarity. Each product has specific areas that align with their main usage focus, indicating distinct opportunities for refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch deployment is straightforward, supported by responsive customer service, ensuring a smooth setup. Mezmo, despite offering comprehensive deployment assistance, could optimize initial configuration processes. Both receive positive customer service reviews, with NetCrunch noted as slightly more accessible.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch provides good value with its cost-effective pricing, particularly beneficial for smaller networks. Mezmo, though perceived as more expensive, offers broader capabilities and significant ROI, making it a strong investment for organizations seeking in-depth data insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mezmo vs. NetCrunch

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo

Ranking in Log Management

52nd

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (80th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Log Management

70th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (81st), Server Monitoring (28th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (64th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Agriculture

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 47% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 32% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Mezmo

Compared 21% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 37% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch

Compared 20% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 17% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 14% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NetCrunch

Compared 13% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cribl vs. Mezmo

July 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Also Known As

LogDNA

No data available

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

NetCrunch is an all-in-one network monitoring platform designed for hybrid IT environments, offering comprehensive agentless monitoring of thousands of devices across different technologies and platforms.

NetCrunch streamlines network management with automated discovery, configuration, and monitoring through rule-defined policies. It covers monitoring across various environments, providing real-time dashboards, dynamic views, and topology maps. With its versatile features, it supports diverse IT ecosystems efficiently. It offers a node-based license model that enables scalable deployment on-prem, self-hosted in the cloud, or in hybrid settings.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Agentless Monitoring: Supports devices using SNMP, server metrics, virtualization, cloud platforms, and traffic flows.
Automated Discovery: Facilitates network configuration and monitoring via 670+ monitoring packs and sensors.
Advanced Alerting: Filters, delays, and correlates alerts to minimize false positives with configurable escalation paths.
Real-time Dashboards: Provides dynamic views and automatic topology maps reflecting device status and relationships.
Action Scripts: Offers 40+ actions like script execution and device reboot to manage network incidents.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from NetCrunch?

Scalability: Simplifies expansion with a node-based licensing model adapting to network growth.
Flexibility: Supports on-prem, cloud, or hybrid models for versatile deployment options.
Efficiency: Automates routine tasks reducing manual intervention and potential errors.
Reliability: Enhances monitoring accuracy with real-time updates and minimized false alerts.
Integration Capability: Works with email, SMS, and service integrations for streamlined communication.

NetCrunch is implemented across industries like healthcare and finance, ensuring comprehensive monitoring solutions that accommodate specific protocol and compliance requirements. It's tailored for seamless integration into various IT architectures optimizing monitoring capabilities tailored to industry standards.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

Mezmo vs. NetCrunch

July 2025

Free Report: Mezmo vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mezmo vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.