Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MetaDefender Kiosk vs Nozomi Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MetaDefender Kiosk
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nozomi Networks
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of MetaDefender Kiosk is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 19.4%, down from 29.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks19.4%
MetaDefender Kiosk1.0%
Other79.6%
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

Use MetaDefender Kiosk?
Leave a review
reviewer2803332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Sales Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Critical networks have gained real-time visibility and detect threats with intelligent monitoring
I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in the next releases of Nozomi Networks, such as improvements in threat intelligence. They have competition from Dragos, which I believe is better in threat intelligence. I do not have much of an answer about the key differences of Nozomi Networks in comparison to other cyber defense solutions because I only work with Nozomi Networks. However, I heard from the market that they might lack in threat intelligence compared to Dragos. Other than that, I see Nozomi Networks as the best platform for customers, easy to manage, deploy, and operate. The cons might be that they lack some threat intelligence features that Dragos offers.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in ...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
We use Nozomi Networks as an intrusion detection system for OT deployments, automation systems, and IoT systems such as medical equipment to protect medical systems and smart meters. We detect any ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SCADAguardian
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: February 2026.
884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.