We performed a comparison between McAfee Web Protection [EOL] and SonicWall CFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering."It's a solution that permits making a granular configuration and it is easier to deploy the same configuration on a lot of devices using the central console. It is the master of the product."
"The stability has a good standard right now."
"The most valuable is the blocking of blacklisted sites, a URL that is, either by intelligence or by McAfee, detected as a malicious site."
"The solution does what it's meant to do."
"The most valuable features of McAfee Web Protection are the reporter, and you have the option to have an agent installed in the notebooks or on the mobiles. You are able to have the same policies inside and outside of your organization which is a benefit."
"It has dependable anti-malware and intrusion prevention features all-in-one package."
"The solution is not too expensive. It's affordable."
"Provides good accessibility and handles any overload very well."
"It is very stable."
"The solution should be more proactive in regards to sending you updates."
"I'm not sure if the solution itself is cloud-based or not. If it isn't they really need to begin to develop that out a bit."
"There is a real need to make sure all the updates and improvements are in order to keep the security at top performance to continue defeating threats that come daily."
"We used a consultant to help us set it up. Unfortunately, he was not that good. They were out of McAfee people. He was a consultant and knew the product, but he was not a McAfee person. How they managed it and how they worked was not straightforward."
"The manufacturerers should have more transparancy about exactly what is getting filtered when you use the product and why."
"We need a better customer experience and more flexibility in the product."
"Lacking filter for spam."
"The solution could always use more security features. If it was more secure, it would be an even stronger product."
"Malware, scanning, capture, and integration should be included with the content filtering."
Earn 20 points
McAfee Web Protection [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Filtering with 16 reviews while SonicWall CFS is ranked 5th in Web Content Filtering. McAfee Web Protection [EOL] is rated 8.2, while SonicWall CFS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Web Protection [EOL] writes "Secure, reasonably priced, and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall CFS writes "Reliable content filtering but need more traffic control". McAfee Web Protection [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SonicWall CFS is most compared with Barracuda Web Security and Filtering.
See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.