Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

McAfee Web Gateway Cloud Service vs Symantec Virtual Secure Web Gateway [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Web Gateway Cloud Se...
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (33rd)
Symantec Virtual Secure Web...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

MF
A scalable and user-friendly tool that provides an easy-to-configure user interface
The solution is used for granular filtering. For example, an organization can use the solution to allow users to access Facebook but stop them from playing games The user interface is easy to configure. We don't have to configure a database manually. It’s already present in the product. We just…
Use Symantec Virtual Secure Web Gateway [EOL]?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.
863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Insurance Company
13%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with McAfee Web Gateway Cloud Service?
The product should provide more integrations. It will benefit the customers as they can use more solutions.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Fortinet and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: July 2025.
863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.