We performed a comparison between McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] and Oracle Audit Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues."
"The feature I have found most valuable is activity monitoring."
"The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Pros →
"The solution is very stable and reliable."
"Our clients can see all of their past actions or the wrong activity done on the network. We can load the diagnostics for the business."
"This solution acts as a complete data warehouse for our audit data."
"Technical support is perfect."
"Out-of-the-box policies ensure our compliance with standards like SOX, ISO 27001, and so on."
"The critical event alerts and reporting features have greatly reduced loss of man hours that would have been spent on going through the whole audit event logs."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Audit Vault is that it is agentless and enhanced user interface."
"Our client was scheduled to take a year and a half to set up compliance, but by deploying this product they were able to do the compliance reports within three months."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"In the next feature, I'd like to see more integrations and updates overall, specifically bottom tech."
"The UI needs to be improved."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Cons →
"Customized reporting is something that we are struggling with, and it is quite tough for us."
"Currently, you need two servers: one for Audit Vault and one for the firewall. If they can combine them into one server, it will be great because it is costly to have two servers. It will also make its installation easier. I have heard that in the new version, there will be only one server for both."
"Some of our customers were asking about latency when the application wants to get to the database."
"The support could improve."
"This solution doesn't audit the network."
"The product monitors only the database and not the operating systems."
"Stability could be improved, we have had some challenges"
"I hear from many people that say IBM Guardian is better than Oracle Audit Vault when it comes to performance. IBM Guardian works transparently in the database, but Oracle Audit Vault consumes some ratios on the server."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Database Security with 3 reviews while Oracle Audit Vault is ranked 3rd in Database Security with 27 reviews. McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Oracle Audit Vault is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] writes "The solution's activity monitoring is valuable, but it should have more integrations and updates overall". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Audit Vault writes "Enhanced interface, agentless, and simple setup". McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security and IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, whereas Oracle Audit Vault is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Trustwave DbProtect, DB Networks DBN-6300 and DataSunrise Database Security.
See our list of best Database Security vendors.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.