McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] vs Oracle Audit Vault comparison

"The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues."

"The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."

"The feature I have found most valuable is activity monitoring."

"A powerful, flexible solution for database traffic monitoring."

"It is a good product for controlling all databases. It is helpful for auditing the data. When people are doing any actions on the databases, they are recorded automatically in the vault. You can work on the collected data to find out exactly what is happening on a database. You can implement database encryption on the databases to control people's access to the database content, such as rows and tables."

"Our clients can see all of their past actions or the wrong activity done on the network. We can load the diagnostics for the business."

"Our client was scheduled to take a year and a half to set up compliance, but by deploying this product they were able to do the compliance reports within three months."

"All of the other components that make up the infrastructure in the environment including the operating system are also quite valuable."

"Oracle Audit Vault has a lot of great features, but what I find most valuable is the database firewall."

"It has provided us with a unique opportunity to automate risk discovery."

"Technical support is perfect."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"In the next feature, I'd like to see more integrations and updates overall, specifically bottom tech."

"The UI needs to be improved."

"Oracle Audit Vault is very stable, with the exception of some certificate issues that disrupted the environment for up to a month."

"Customized reporting is something that we are struggling with, and it is quite tough for us."

"One feature that is missing is the ability to have a secret server that is always encrypted."

"Currently, you need two servers: one for Audit Vault and one for the firewall. If they can combine them into one server, it will be great because it is costly to have two servers. It will also make its installation easier. I have heard that in the new version, there will be only one server for both."

"Some of our customers were asking about latency when the application wants to get to the database."

"We would like to see the ability to administer and manage the solution through Enterprise Manager 13c, and development of the dashboards that are generally missing."

"The product monitors only the database and not the operating systems."

"The support could improve."

"It's not expensive compared to other products that are available."

"For the bank, the license was $48,000 last time. That was the licensing for the bank on just one license."

"The licensing cost is about $360,000, annually."

"This solution is definitely not expensive, and it is a small fraction of the overall database licensing costs."

"Oracle can be an expensive solution depending on the options and user needs."