Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SonicWall Capture Client vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

SonicWall and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. SonicWall is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. SonicWall holds a 0.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SonicWall users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
SonicWall Capture Client
Read 10 SonicWall Capture Client reviews
  • 1,770 Views
  • 1,505 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 10,526 Views
  • 7,895 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and SonicWall Capture Client compete in the endpoint security space. Trellix seems to have the upper hand due to its robust integration capabilities and centralized management offering.

Features: Trellix provides centralized management with ePolicy Orchestrator, seamless integration with security modules, and tools for policy creation. SonicWall excels in real-time deep memory inspection, content filtering, and multi-stage attack handling.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could optimize its resource consumption and simplify its configuration procedures. SonicWall should address performance issues caused by resource consumption, modernize its management console, and improve support for legacy operating systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises and cloud solutions, with generally positive customer support. SonicWall provides straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive technical support, though it may experience delays with complex tickets.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is reasonably priced but higher than some competitors, though it offers substantial ROI. SonicWall offers competitive pricing against high-end competitors but may be costly for small to medium-sized businesses, providing positive security ROI by reducing threat management overheads.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 863,651 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SonicWall Capture Client
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
46th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
38th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

LUIZ FERNANDO MARIANO SILVA - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables faster updates and provides an easy-to-use user interface
I have an advanced license that includes all features. Though we have the license, we cannot use it completely because it is not enabled in the Microsoft tier. It does not make sense. We do not want to buy it separately because the price is different if we buy separate licenses.
Read full review
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."
"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."
"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."
"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."
"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."
"The product’s interface is easy to use."
More SonicWall Capture Client pros
"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."
"The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."
"The product is fairly reliable."
"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."
"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."
"The most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security include its protection capabilities such as DNS and endpoint security, DNS threat prevention, as well as advanced threat prevention."
"Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware."
"The detection is great and the solution is constantly improving."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros
 

Cons

"The implementation is not easy."
"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."
"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."
"They should improve their user interface."
"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."
"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."
"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."
"XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall."
More SonicWall Capture Client cons
"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"The interface is complex."
"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."
"They can make it free, but that's not going to happen."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."
"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."
"The product is very expensive."
"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."
"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine."
"The initial price is very good as they give good initial discounts, but it seems a little expensive once you renew the license."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."
"Trellix Endpoint Security is an inexpensive platform."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
863,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?
SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?
It is not similar to other products. For XDR, users have to use another product. XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall. If a user has SonicWall MDR services, then they...
See all answers
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 20% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 19% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 12% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 8% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 8% of the time
More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 15% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 8% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 7% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
July 2025
SonicWall Capture Client reportDownload SonicWall Capture Client product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Luton College
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Buyer's Guide
SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Free Report: SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
863,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.