Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SonicWall Capture Client vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

SonicWall and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. SonicWall is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. SonicWall holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SonicWall users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
SonicWall Capture Client
Read 11 SonicWall Capture Client reviews
  • 1,792 Views
  • 1,398 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 159 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 9,310 Views
  • 6,424 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and SonicWall Capture Client compete in the endpoint security market. Trellix appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive management and adaptability, whereas SonicWall specializes in rollback features and ease of use, which are particularly valuable for smaller businesses.

Features: Trellix offers centralized management with ePolicy Orchestrator, antivirus, McAfee Data Loss Prevention, and Drive Encryption. Its scalability and efficient dashboard enhance adaptability for larger organizations. SonicWall features rollback during ransomware attacks, Capture ATP integration for threat intelligence, and a user-friendly management console, appealing to businesses valuing simplicity and speed.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could benefit from simplified data management, better malware handling, and resource usage optimization. Users suggest streamlining its solutions to improve integration. SonicWall faces performance challenges, resource consumption issues, and variable support quality. Lighter agents and consistent feature availability could improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers various deployment options and robust support for large-scale operations, often requiring technical teams. SonicWall simplifies implementation with public cloud offerings noted for ease and lower complexity. Both provide generally favorable customer service, though Trellix could improve support speed and capacity, while SonicWall faces specific technical support hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is perceived as more expensive but offers bundled solutions and extensive features attractive to organizations seeking integrated security measures. SonicWall is commended for cost-effective pricing, ideal for smaller firms desiring detailed protection without high overhead. Both solutions provide ROI through effective threat management, with Trellix requiring substantial initial investment but offering long-term savings.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
SonicWall Capture Client offers cost savings, improved security, reduced manual work, lower infection rates, and easy deployment for better productivity.
Sentiment score
8.0
Trellix Endpoint Security offers strong ROI with enhanced security, cost savings, ease of management, and effective ransomware protection.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
We have observed tremendous return on investment after implementing Trellix Endpoint Security as it is a more cost-effective solution compared to other products.
HameedAhmed
Joint Director at PAA
Clients appreciate the solution’s customization capabilities and ongoing product improvements.
Abdullah Al Hadi
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
There are two parts: one is the encryption which is standard and no AI is needed, but the data protection part could benefit from AI to detect new types of data and protect it.
VenkatKrishnan
VP - Cyber Security at Olam International
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
HameedAhmed - PeerSpot reviewerAbdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
VK
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.9
SonicWall Capture Client support is mixed, with some satisfied but many seeking faster response and improved escalation processes.
Sentiment score
7.4
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's customer service is praised for efficiency but varies in consistency and response time regionally.
Partners can purchase single endpoints at prices equivalent to 1,000-endpoint deals, providing an advantage for managed security service provider partners.
Hesdi Triantono
Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi
While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
The response time is a notable issue.
Sampath Acharya
Technical Associate at Valuepoint Systems
I would rate their customer service nine out of ten.
HameedAhmed
Joint Director at PAA
When we implemented Trellix Endpoint Security in their network, multiple malwares were detected.
Mohit Dhingra
Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
HT
AA
Sampath Acharya - PeerSpot reviewerHameedAhmed - PeerSpot reviewer
MD
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
SonicWall Capture Client delivers scalable licensing, easy installation, cloud management, and an accessible interface, favored by small to medium businesses.
Sentiment score
8.2
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in scalability, adaptability, and integration, supporting large enterprises with flexible deployment and resource management.
There are no restrictions on the scalability of SonicWall Capture Client.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
SonicWall Capture Client is accessed via cloud-based management console.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The installation process is straightforward, requiring only five pilot installations to enable customers to complete the remaining installations independently.
Hesdi Triantono
Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
I would rate the scalability of the solution as a six out of ten, indicating some challenges due to downtime requirements.
Sampath Acharya
Technical Associate at Valuepoint Systems
Trellix Endpoint Security is scalable.
HameedAhmed
Joint Director at PAA
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
AA
HT
Sampath Acharya - PeerSpot reviewerHameedAhmed - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
SonicWall Capture Client's stability divides opinion, praised for threat prevention but critiqued for high resource consumption and slowdowns.
Sentiment score
8.1
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is reliable and well-rated, though occasional performance issues occur during updates or specific configurations.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
HameedAhmed
Joint Director at PAA
I would rate the stability of Trellix Endpoint Security as near perfect, close to ten out of ten.
Abdullah Al Hadi
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
I think it's stable enough; earlier it had glitches, but now it's stable enough.
VenkatKrishnan
VP - Cyber Security at Olam International
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
HameedAhmed - PeerSpot reviewerAbdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
VK
 

Room For Improvement

SonicWall Capture Client suffers from performance issues, outdated interface, high RAM use, and lacks robust threat detection and support.
Trellix Endpoint Security needs improvements in speed, integration, user experience, resource usage, and compatibility for better security and support.
One of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier licenses within a single tenant, which can be problematic when users need to deploy different licenses.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.
Hesdi Triantono
Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature.
Sampath Acharya
Technical Associate at Valuepoint Systems
Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities.
Abdullah Al Hadi
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
The product does not seem to be cloud-native.
reviewer2696286
Architect at a government with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
AA
HT
Sampath Acharya - PeerSpot reviewerAbdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2696286 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

SonicWall Capture Client pricing receives mixed reviews for cost-effectiveness, varying by business size, region, and additional costs.
Trellix Endpoint Security offers mid-range, flexible pricing with rich features, though renewal costs may rise and extras incur fees.
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year.
Sampath Acharya
Technical Associate at Valuepoint Systems
Trellix Endpoint Security is cost-effective and provides excellent value for money.
HameedAhmed
Joint Director at PAA
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good; compared to other tools, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides lower costs.
Abhimanyu Das
Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
AA
Sampath Acharya - PeerSpot reviewerHameedAhmed - PeerSpot reviewerAbhimanyu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

SonicWall Capture Client provides robust protection features, including rollback, machine learning, and dual-agent real-time threat detection.
Trellix Endpoint Security excels with centralized management, integration, real-time monitoring, and adaptability for comprehensive threat protection.
Machine learning is particularly effective due to SonicWall sandboxing's threat intelligence database of approximately 7.1 billion entries.
Hesdi Triantono
Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi
One is that users can use the sandbox of SonicWall, which is called Capture ATP for free.
CanbolatAydin
Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
For more quotes and insights, download the SonicWall Capture Client report
Trellix Endpoint Security is a proven, robust, and cost-effective solution that protects the organization from different types of ransomware and attacks.
HameedAhmed
Joint Director at PAA
Including options like Application Control (formerly Solidcore), integrated monitoring, change control, DLP, and advanced threat protection, the solution offers comprehensive security.
Abdullah Al Hadi
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
The detection capability of Trellix Endpoint Security is higher than traditional antivirus solutions.
Mohit Dhingra
Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report
HT
AA
HameedAhmed - PeerSpot reviewerAbdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
MD
 

Categories and Ranking

SonicWall Capture Client
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
44th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
43rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
7th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
159
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.7%
SonicWall Capture Client0.8%
Other95.5%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

HT
Hesdi Triantono
Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi
Has consistently delivered double-layer protection and simplified policy application while needing mobile compatibility and better MacOS support
A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.Occasionally, the Sentinel engine becomes unresponsive, particularly when customers do not properly restart or shutdown their systems. This requires a hard restart after installation to resolve the issue. Installation on Mac OS can be challenging, requiring multiple attempts due to version compatibility requirements. We must ensure the SonicWall Capture Client version is stable for Mac OS. The RAM usage is higher compared to SentinelOne, utilizing approximately 150 megabytes of memory. This is a common concern from customers, and reducing RAM consumption would be beneficial.
Read full review
Abhimanyu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Abhimanyu Das
Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.
From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?
A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.Occasionally, the Sentinel engine becomes unresponsive, particu...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SonicWall Capture Client?
The solution is used primarily in hospitality, specifically hotels, and manufacturing sectors. Approximately 70% of usage comes from hospitality, with the remainder from manufacturing.In hotel case...
See all answers
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 11% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 11% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 6% of the time
More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 5% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 5% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 5% of the time
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SonicWall Capture Client
January 2026
SonicWall Capture Client reportDownload SonicWall Capture Client product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
January 2026
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Luton College
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Buyer's Guide
SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
January 2026
Free Report: SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.