McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] vs Recorded Future comparison

McAfee Global Threat Intell...

Read 13 Recorded Future reviews

7,771 Views
5,828 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Recorded Future and McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] are frequently compared in the realm of security intelligence solutions. Recorded Future seems to have the upper hand with its superior real-time threat intelligence insights that enhance decision-making, whereas McAfee's edge lies in its comprehensive threat protection through an established database.

Features: Recorded Future's highlights include its real-time alerting system, advanced threat hunting, and predictive analytics, which significantly improve proactive threat management. McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] features a well-integrated security platform, market-wide anomaly detection, and a vast threat database that collectively strengthen its protective capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment enabling swift integration, coupled with commendable customer support services. In contrast, McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] provides a more diverse but complex deployment structure within its security ecosystem, supported by a robust customer support network.

Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and solid ROI due to its quick risk reduction from real-time threat intelligence. On the other hand, McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL], though perceived as more costly, balances its price with extensive threat protection and comprehensive security features, reflecting robust ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: July 2025).

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Download the complete report

Helped 863,641 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Global Threat Intell...

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Recorded Future

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Digital Risk Protection (1st)

Featured Reviews

Chetankumar Savalagimath

Delivery Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Informative dashboards and integrates well with other products, but it needs artificial intelligence for more advanced threat detection

The product can be developed by bringing in AI and ML-based logic to learn from external emerging threats. This would help to keep the feeds real-time and secure the client's environment. Furthermore, it should use automation to notify customers or remediate the environment. The analytics and big data platform integration can be improved to provide better visibility of past data to look for existing threats or missed threats. It will be better able to predict future threats and be resilient against new threats, risks, or attacks. A cloud-based solution can be bought in to look for wider issues in external users or technologies.

Read full review

Dr. Merrick Watchorn

Chief Executive Officer at The Watchorn Innovation Group, Inc. (TWIGI)

Traceless online searches, stable, and scalable

There is a semantic oncology dynamic relationship between how the MIGR Tech framework needs more data infusion enrichment capabilities. To be clear, what the vendor is doing is of a high standard, and my only critique is that they need to make new enhancements. I am aware that the vendor is making a concerted effort to add additional information to their repository, and it is something they actively do. The vendor has publicly stated that they will work on this, and I always pay attention to make sure they adhere to that. This does not change over time. The export feature of the recording needs to stop being so restricted. When they record in order to save themselves by operations, I would expect that as a super user, if I asked to download the dataset I'm looking for, I would not be limited in my data downloads. One of the cool things is, let's say we do our entire research and we want to save all of the materials that were returned, and that special custom search that we made, we can export that into a CSV file. The problem is it gets restricted. So sometimes when I say it's restricted, we don't get all the data that we saw online. So then we have to go and manually search for the specific thing we're looking for. I would like to have the URI and whatever value set that I search off, and for the NLP package to not be stripped out. It's like saying I want to do a Pcap analysis. Don't strip out the Pcap when I asked to see Pcap. That's what they're doing. They do this for many different reasons. One of them is, imagine if everyone downloaded datasets that are very large and it brings the whole system down.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All of the feeds can be enriched by using the predefined content pack, which can be deployed and used by SOC operations, threat hunting teams, and engineering teams."

"The solution is diverse and provides me with a lot of different mechanisms for evaluation."

"The most valuable features of Recorded Future are the useful alerts it provides. If we are monitoring a domain, the solution will provide us with an alert in a prompt manner. It is simple for clients to receive alerts. The advanced search is useful for more accurate filter results."

"The tool is helpful in vulnerability assessment of zero-day vulnerabilities and phishing domains. The solution provides information on any domains of the organization that has undergone phishing or any other cyberattacks."

"The tool can integrate with a lot of security control and proactive protection devices."

"Recorded Future has some important strengths. It has a long history of success in the market and is known for excellent threat intelligence. Its team is skilled at using AI to search for and report on threats. For many years, it was seen as the best in the industry."

"From the feedback I've received from my clients, the most valuable feature is the ability to personalize the solution. The ability to have a customized dashboard makes it easy for leadership and management to obtain details. Intelligence analysts or security engineers care about the actions and results, whereas the leadership care about graphs and reports. Recorded Future helps my clients create reports and also determine how the intelligence that is generated is consumed. They can easily show the benefits to the leadership without them having to invest 10 hours a week into transferring numbers into a graph or into creating reports."

"The most valuable feature is Recorded Future's protection of exposed customer data on the hardware side."

"The intel that they were providing us over the emails was very good. If it found any hashtag in our organization's name on the dark web, a rogue IP, or a marketplace, it would send us an email and notify us that this is being mentioned, and if we want, they can take some action."

More Recorded Future pros

Cons

"The analytics and big data platform integration can be improved to provide better visibility of past data to look for existing threats or missed threats."

"We can get the data of different malware active throughout the globe, but it would be good if we can do sandboxing of a file. For example, on Any Run, we can perform sandboxing of malware along with their intel about a particular file or hash. It would be great if they have a feature like that."

"Recorded Future is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"The solution would benefit from introducing automation."

"The tool should improve its third-party supply chain risks because there is a lack of visibility."

"The customer support is frustrating and not efficient. They always request logs and screenshots that seem irrelevant."

"The product gives many false positives. If someone talks about the brand or organization name in the public domain over chats or blocks, it gets highlighted. It may not necessarily be a threat but still gets highlighted which increases the false positive count."

"The solution could improve in reducing the false positives. However, most of the other tools on the market have false positives. If they enhance their data algorithm, it could improve the accuracy of results and minimize false positives. Identifying patterns of false possibilities can aid in developing better reporting features that could potentially eliminate them in the future. This recording feature tool could benefit from adopting similar techniques utilized by other tools to enhance its functionality. By doing so, it could minimize the need for manual efforts in distinguishing true positives from false positives, ultimately reducing the workload."

"Lacks sufficient visibility of malware and international APT attacks."

More Recorded Future cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is affordable and it also depends on the usage of the toolset."

"The price of the solution is worth it. The overall performance of the solution outweighs the cost."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten."

"The biggest disadvantage of Recorded Future is the cost here in Eastern Europe. The solution is correctly priced for big companies who have the money to invest in such solutions. Also, the solution is useless on its own, which means that you have to invest in other solutions with which Recorded Future can be integrated. At present, Recorded Future can cost 60,000 euros per year. I am able to offer my clients a 5% to 10% discount, but in this region, the cost is still prohibitive even with the discount. If Recorded Future were more flexible in terms of price, there would be better sales opportunities in Europe and Eastern Europe, in particular, because we have more small- and medium-sized companies here."

"There appear to be up to five different levels, with the most expensive version costing around $95,000 to $105,000 a year for subscription services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Recorded Future?

The most valuable feature of Recorded Future is how it detects everything regarding our domain.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?

I am not the person responsible for purchases, but it's known that Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Recorded Future?

Their research capabilities and the human aspect should be more effective. The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs. Their research should be wider and more i...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Recorded Future

Compared 11% of the time

ZeroFOX vs Recorded Future

Compared 7% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Recorded Future

Compared 7% of the time

Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future

Compared 6% of the time

Intel 471 vs Recorded Future

Compared 5% of the time

More Recorded Future Competitors

Product Reports

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Download McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] product report

McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Recorded Future product report

Overview

Based on activity from millions of sensors world-wide and an extensive research team, McAfee Labs publishes timely, relevant threat activity via McAfee Global Threat Intelligence (GTI). This always-on, cloud-based threat intelligence service enables accurate protection against known and fast-emerging threats by providing threat determination and contextual reputation metrics. McAfee GTI integrates directly with our security products, instantly protecting against emerging threats to reduce operational efforts and time between detection and containment.

McAfee

Recorded Future is a powerful and effective cyber threat intelligence (CTI) platform that aims to empower administrators to protect their organizations from threats, both known and unknown. The machine learning engine that Recorded Future utilizes can process the same amount of data that 9,000 analysts working five days a week, eight hours a day for an entire year can process. It simplifies threat detection and remediation so that organizations can focus on other tasks.

Recorded Future Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Recorded Future include:

Quick threat identification and resolution. The suite of threat detection and resolution features that Recorded Future provides enables users to find and react to threats faster than users who employ their competitors. Organizations can identify 22 times more threats 10 times faster than they would have been able to with any other solution. They can also resolve these threats 63% faster than they were able to before.

Access far-reaching deep insights. Recorded Future gives users the ability to expand their vision beyond that which is immediately visible to them. They can set Recorded Future to detect issues that originate outside of the immediate vicinity of their network. Organizations can utilize machine learning to analyze for links between themselves and the dark web. This provides users insights as to what their vulnerabilities are and gives them insights that they can use to remediate any issues that have arisen or will arise.

Customization. Organizations can integrate Recorded Future with a wide variety of other security tools. If the organization feels that Recorded Future is lacking the capability that they need, then it can expand its toolbox by combining it with other solutions. Additionally, users can easily create dashboards and modify them to best meet their objectives as their needs change.

Recorded Future Features

Some of the many features Recorded Future offers include:

Vulnerability scanning tools. Recorded Future is built with the ability to scan for, identify, and score potential vulnerabilities in real time. It searches a wide variety of sources for information on the risks that an organization faces. This information is analyzed and scored for severity in real time. These tools enable users to prioritize the most severe threats over those issues that will only be nuisances.

Threat authentication. Users can set security protocols that Recorded Future leverages to reduce false positives. It has tools that compare the detected threats against the organization’s protocols. This allows the system to notify administrators whether they are looking at an actual threat or simply a mistake that the system initially misidentified.

Attack surface intelligence. Organizations gain the ability to see the points of vulnerability that would normally be invisible to them and would only be visible to outside attackers. This tool fully exposes the environment that surrounds their network. Everything from historical data going as far back as 10 years to real-time information is gathered so that administrators can create the best possible security strategy for their organization.

Reviews from Real Users

Recorded future is a solution that stands out when compared to its top competitors. Two major advantages it offers are the threat research tools that it provides and the threat monitoring capabilities that it enables users to leverage.

A security operations lead at a comms service provider writes, “Recorded Future covers a lot of different use cases. For example, we are using it for threat intelligence research. We do use the tool to make active research on what is found around the threat. We look at patterns, for example, and see what can be elaborated on from that.”

They also write, “We can also use it for active monitoring in the customer interface. We can monitor the business side of a campaign. We can monitor for specific threats or market activity on the dashboard. We can develop queries to run in a continuous mode in order to get the best reviews.”

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk

Threat Intelligence Platforms