McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

The compared McAfee and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #10 in ATP , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Sophos and others in Firewalls.

To learn more, read our detailed Firewalls Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Firewalls

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate

Featured Reviews

Mageshwaran S

Solution Architect at airtel

Enables customers to manage security effortlessly with intuitive features and easy integration

In terms of improvements for Fortinet FortiGate, they could offer evaluation licenses, as compared to Meraki, which provides a 90-day evaluation. In Fortinet FortiGate, they do not provide standard evaluation licenses; instead, we need to request them from the OEM through the account manager for POCs. If we want to conduct a demo, we need to work with real hardware. In comparison to Cisco, we have DCloud, which helps with providing demos to customers, but in Meraki, I need to reach out to them, book a lab, and they need to provide all the hardware. I need remote access and L3 engineers to program it; only then can I offer a real-time demo to the customer.

Read full review

reviewer999975

Computer Technician at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We cannot find resources to help us configure it, so most of the time the virus still goes on our computer and McAfee doesn't detect it

It's pretty easy to use on a daily basis, but there are no other features because it's hard to configure on the server. On the endpoint it's really easy to push. It's hard to configure on the server, though. It's hard to find resources to help us configure it, and there is not much online help that you can find. Most of the time, we were looking at the forums, and we needed to go very deep to find what we were looking for. It was hard, and McAfee was not really helpful when we were trying to get the product to work perfectly. This is why are changing it.

Read full review

Twinkle Solanki

Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd

Continuous network insight has improved early threat detection and streamlined investigations

Overall, we have a positive experience with Trellix Network Detection and Response, but like any enterprise security solution, there are areas where it can continue to improve. One area would be user interface and dashboard customization. While the platform provides a lot of valuable information, new users can sometimes face a learning curve when navigating and investigating and creating customized views. More intuitive dashboards would simplify workflows and help analysts access critical information even faster. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. The existing reporting capabilities are useful, but more flexibility and customizable reporting options would make it easier to generate executive-level summaries, compliance reports, and operational metrics for different audiences.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to install since we only need to follow the user manual, documents, and articles provided by Fortinet to install the product."

"I have found the IPS, antivirus, and the feature that allows you to have a firewall in the same appliance most valuable."

"Fortigate can mitigate all attacks, it can handle a lot, it has a good set of UTM features, a good bandwidth shaping mechanism, and other features."

"It is a one box solution, which covers most of the edge device’s requirements."

"Fortinet FortiGate is considered the best in the European market for security reasons."

"We would recommend this firewall at any given point in time."

"It does not require a lot of maintenance."

"It does a lot for you for intrusion protection and as an antivirus. The threat management bundle is worth the money. You don't need another company to monitor your web traffic for you. You can do everything yourself on the firewall. You restrict your own black list for people on the firewall. You don't need to pay some other company for another product to do that for you. The firewall can do that for you. So, it's an easy-to-use product for people to be independent. They don't need to rely on other vendors to do what the firewall can do. They can do everything."

More Fortinet FortiGate pros

"For managing multiple MFE firewalls it is incredibly handy, convenient, and it is easy to use the product with McAfee Control Centre."

"It does give certain protection for everything that is well configured on our McAfee server. We have good protection with it. If we could find a feature and make it work, it would work perfectly, there would be no bugs, and it would be really good."

"ROI: It's good."

"We have 10 offices throughout Brazil, and now they are all connected by using the VPN feature of the firewall."

"It's a very functional and stable product if you're looking for a Layer 7 firewall with reputation filtering and encrypted traffic inspection."

"The best features that Trellix Network Detection and Response offers are visibility, threat detection, and immediate response, which allows us to take action almost instantly while keeping proof through proper data capture and maintaining logs for future analysis to prevent attacks and ensure that we have the right policies and controls."

"Overall, security operations are approximately 30 to 40 percent more efficient, and we can save time because everything automatically analyzes, resulting in approximately 40 to 50 percent time savings."

"The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams."

"It's a very simple solution and a very effective product in my network."

"It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye."

"Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats."

"Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization by creating a better safeguard and protecting us from threats."

"Trellix NDR provides an essential defense by automatically responding to network incidents that firewalls may not catch."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"FortiGate's reporting features could provide a better picture of what is happening in the box."

"They should improve high CPU and memory usage that occurs."

"The way everything is set up could be easier. Currently, people need a lot of experience and knowledge to administer it and to link it to devices."

"There are some complex administration tasks in their administration portal. That needs to be improved."

"At the moment, if you don't integrate any third-party solution with a simple Fortinet FortiGate box, the box would not function as expected for superb protection."

"They could improve the response time and quality of support."

"The security of Fortinet FortiGate could improve."

"The solution has limited scalability. You have to change the hardware in order to ensure the solution can scale."

More Fortinet FortiGate cons

"Customer support and AV are both lacking and are really hard to come to you when the product is installed. Those are the two major points that they need to work on."

"Administration of the firewall is a little confusing for end users."

"The hardware is not stable and we have faced many stability issues."

"HA configuration is a bit difficult for the first time."

"Migrating from v7 to v8 of McAfee Firewall Enterprise, in many cases, involves you having to completely re-write all of your previous McAfee Firewall Enterprise v7 policies due to the difference in the way the interfaces are named in the product going from v7 to v8."

"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."

"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."

"FireEye’s main feature is its sandboxing or threat emulation capabilities to detect malware with extra add-ons such as signature-based IPS or endpoint protection, but these features are lacking compared to most IPS or endpoint vendors."

"The negative aspect is support."

"Improvement-wise, the initial setup, fine-tuning, and learning can take effort."

"It is very expensive, the price could be better."

"It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there."

"Trellix Network Detection and Response is stable but occasionally encounters performance issues, which we can fix quickly."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite affordable for our customers. There is a separate cost for IPS, antivirus, web filtering, and other features. They have a great choice of licenses. You can go for the license that you want, which is quite useful."

"The price is relatively expensive compared to other solutions which are providing similar features."

"The price of Fortinet FortiGate is the lowest in the market."

"The solution is offered as an annual license."

"It is more expensive than Sophos. Fortinet is overall more expensive than Sophos. The small range of Fortinet, such as 60F and 80F, is more expensive than the small range of Sophos. Sophos is cheaper. In addition, if you jump from 80F Series to 100F Series, the price doubles."

"The license for Fortinet FortiGate is affordable in my country."

"It is an expensive solution."

"In the Asian economy in which we operate, FortiGate is expensive."

More Fortinet FortiGate pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The pricing is a little high."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	370
Midsize Enterprise	138
Large Enterprise	195

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?

When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage a...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?

From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know...

See all answers

What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?

As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

The price for Trellix Network Detection and Response is reasonable. The pricing is reasonable, and I do not need to b...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

The negative aspect is support. When I need urgent support from Trellix, there is a response after four hours or thre...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?

I am working with Trellix Network Detection and Response as part of my overall experience with these products today. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 5% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 3% of the time

Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Competitors

SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]

Compared 45% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate

June 2026

Download Fortinet FortiGate product report

Buyer's Guide

Firewalls

May 2026

McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] report

Download McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

May 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

Fortinet FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall

Firewall Enterprise MFE, Intel Security Firewall Enterprise MFE

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

Fortinet FortiGate is a versatile network security tool offering features like VPN, firewall, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and scalability. It is known for its performance and integration with other Fortinet products, making it a preferred choice for robust cybersecurity.

Fortinet FortiGate stands out as a comprehensive cybersecurity solution with strong performance and ease of configuration. It delivers unified threat management, integrating features such as dynamic routing, SD-WAN support, and centralized management. Despite its strengths, improvements in the web interface's stability, pricing structures, and reporting capabilities are needed. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and automation advancements to enhance the experience further. These enhancements, alongside improvements in bandwidth management and the reduction of licensing costs, are points of interest for users looking to capitalize on FortiGate's extensive capabilities.

What are Fortinet FortiGate's key features?

VPN: Ensures secure remote connections.
Firewall: Protects against unauthorized access.
Web Filtering: Blocks malicious sites and content.
Application Control: Manages and controls applications.
Intrusion Prevention: Detects and prevents vulnerabilities.
SSL Inspection: Enhances security by inspecting encrypted traffic.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Fortinet FortiGate?

Affordability: Offers cost-effective security solutions.
Reliability: Known for consistent and stable performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other Fortinet products.
Comprehensive Protection: Provides broad threat protection capabilities.

Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries as a primary firewall system for securing internet gateways and safeguarding data centers. It supports businesses in achieving SD-WAN integration and enhances cybersecurity by providing essential features like antivirus, web filtering, and application control. Enterprises utilize FortiGate for securing remote connections and ensuring compliance with security standards, making it adaptable for different network sizes and industries.

Fortinet

McAfee Firewall Enterprise defends critical assets, such as regulated data repositories (customer, financial, and healthcare data), email and web servers, extranets, and data centers. This proxy-based firewall also offers application visibility and deep application controls for defense, delivers strong policy-based controls, blocks the latest threats, and eliminates unwanted traffic.

McAfee

Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat protection with advanced detection of zero-day attacks and APTs. Its user-friendly dashboard and real-time response capabilities enhance security and visibility across networks.

Trellix Network Detection and Response stands out with its MVX engine, leveraging virtual machines for comprehensive behavioral analysis. The solution supports detection of advanced cyber threats through features like sandboxing and application filtering, offering real-time response and packet capture for detailed contextual insights. Companies benefit from seamless integration with other platforms, enhancing usability and overall protection. User-friendly interfaces improve network visibility, while stability and ease of configuration safeguard against both signature-based and signature-less threats.

What key features does Trellix offer?

Zero-Day Attacks Detection: Identifies and mitigates unknown threats.
APTs Detection: Detects advanced persistent threats through sophisticated techniques.
MVX Engine: Uses virtual machines for behavioral analysis.
Sandboxing: Adds a layer of threat protection.
Real-Time Response: Offers immediate threat mitigation and context.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Enhances visibility with application filtering.

What are the benefits of Trellix Network Detection and Response?

Enhanced Usability: Integrates easily with other platforms for seamless operations.
Detailed Context: Real-time packet capture provides in-depth threat analysis.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Covers both signature-based and signature-less threats.
Improved Visibility: Offers clear dashboard analytics for network monitoring.

Companies in sectors like finance, healthcare, and enterprise security utilize Trellix Network Detection and Response for tasks such as network intrusion detection, endpoint protection, and securing data transmission paths. It aids in threat investigations, pre-sales demos, and network forensics, reducing risks by protecting against cyber threats like phishing.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, Dell, HP, Oracle, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Vodafone, Orange, BT Group, Telstra, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, NTT Communications, Tata Communications, SoftBank, China Mobile, Singtel, Telus, Rogers Communications, Bell Canada, Telkom Indonesia, Telkom South Africa, Telmex, Telia Company, Telkom Kenya

French Ministry of Education, RWTH Aachen, Avency, Cegedim, Cobweb, Intel Security, Cemex Mauser, R_sler Oberfl_chentechnik

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Sophos and others in Firewalls. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.