No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

The compared McAfee and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #6 in ATP , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 53 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 4,931 Views
  • 2,712 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Firewalls Report (Updated: July 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
July 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Firewall Enterprise ...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Network Detection a...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer999975 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer999975
Computer Technician at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We cannot find resources to help us configure it, so most of the time the virus still goes on our computer and McAfee doesn't detect it
It's pretty easy to use on a daily basis, but there are no other features because it's hard to configure on the server. On the endpoint it's really easy to push. It's hard to configure on the server, though. It's hard to find resources to help us configure it, and there is not much online help that you can find. Most of the time, we were looking at the forums, and we needed to go very deep to find what we were looking for. It was hard, and McAfee was not really helpful when we were trying to get the product to work perfectly. This is why are changing it.
Read full review
Twinkle Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Twinkle Solanki
Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd
Continuous network insight has improved early threat detection and streamlined investigations
Overall, we have a positive experience with Trellix Network Detection and Response, but like any enterprise security solution, there are areas where it can continue to improve. One area would be user interface and dashboard customization. While the platform provides a lot of valuable information, new users can sometimes face a learning curve when navigating and investigating and creating customized views. More intuitive dashboards would simplify workflows and help analysts access critical information even faster. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. The existing reporting capabilities are useful, but more flexibility and customizable reporting options would make it easier to generate executive-level summaries, compliance reports, and operational metrics for different audiences.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For managing multiple MFE firewalls it is incredibly handy, convenient, and it is easy to use the product with McAfee Control Centre."
"ROI: It's good."
"We have 10 offices throughout Brazil, and now they are all connected by using the VPN feature of the firewall."
"It's a very functional and stable product if you're looking for a Layer 7 firewall with reputation filtering and encrypted traffic inspection."
"It does give certain protection for everything that is well configured on our McAfee server. We have good protection with it. If we could find a feature and make it work, it would work perfectly, there would be no bugs, and it would be really good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline."
"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."
"Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall, and if you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly."
"The initial setup was straightforward, you can do it by yourself, you don't have to find a partner or a FireEye expert."
"If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution."
"The product is very easy to configure."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted our organization by making our security team more confident and responsible, knowing that the network is being watched all the time, allowing us to respond to threats much faster than we used to."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
 

Cons

"Customer support and AV are both lacking and are really hard to come to you when the product is installed. Those are the two major points that they need to work on."
"HA configuration is a bit difficult for the first time."
"Administration of the firewall is a little confusing for end users."
"Migrating from v7 to v8 of McAfee Firewall Enterprise, in many cases, involves you having to completely re-write all of your previous McAfee Firewall Enterprise v7 policies due to the difference in the way the interfaces are named in the product going from v7 to v8."
"The hardware is not stable and we have faced many stability issues."
"To improve Trellix Network Detection and Response, I suggest enhancing reporting customization; the reports can be much better, and I should have the ability to customize them much more freely."
"Technical packaging could be improved."
"The pricing is not reasonable. The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response is a powerful tool with areas that need improvement, such as dashboard customization options and reporting flexibility."
"They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules."
"I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."
"I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed."
"Customer service and technical support could use some enhancement. On a scale from 1 to 10, it is between six and seven."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is a little high."
"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."
"The tool is a bit pricey."
"It's an expensive solution."
"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is positive, as the setup process was straightforward, licensing was flexible, and the value deliver...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
Based on my experience with the solution, I do not see any improvements needed for Trellix Network Detection and Response at present; it might be required in the future, but there is no space to im...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?
Our main use case for Trellix Network Detection and Response is to maintain oversight of our network traffic and catch any threats or unusual activity as early as possible. Trellix Network Detectio...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 45% of the time
Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 14% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 14% of the time
Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 7% of the time
More McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Competitors
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 6% of the time
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 5% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 5% of the time
Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
July 2026
McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] reportDownload McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Network Detection and Response
July 2026
Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

Firewall Enterprise MFE, Intel Security Firewall Enterprise MFE
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Overview

McAfee Firewall Enterprise defends critical assets, such as regulated data repositories (customer, financial, and healthcare data), email and web servers, extranets, and data centers. This proxy-based firewall also offers application visibility and deep application controls for defense, delivers strong policy-based controls, blocks the latest threats, and eliminates unwanted traffic.
McAfee

Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat protection with advanced detection of zero-day attacks and APTs. Its user-friendly dashboard and real-time response capabilities enhance security and visibility across networks.

Trellix Network Detection and Response stands out with its MVX engine, leveraging virtual machines for comprehensive behavioral analysis. The solution supports detection of advanced cyber threats through features like sandboxing and application filtering, offering real-time response and packet capture for detailed contextual insights. Companies benefit from seamless integration with other platforms, enhancing usability and overall protection. User-friendly interfaces improve network visibility, while stability and ease of configuration safeguard against both signature-based and signature-less threats.

What key features does Trellix offer?
  • Zero-Day Attacks Detection: Identifies and mitigates unknown threats.
  • APTs Detection: Detects advanced persistent threats through sophisticated techniques.
  • MVX Engine: Uses virtual machines for behavioral analysis.
  • Sandboxing: Adds a layer of threat protection.
  • Real-Time Response: Offers immediate threat mitigation and context.
  • User-Friendly Dashboard: Enhances visibility with application filtering.
What are the benefits of Trellix Network Detection and Response?
  • Enhanced Usability: Integrates easily with other platforms for seamless operations.
  • Detailed Context: Real-time packet capture provides in-depth threat analysis.
  • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Covers both signature-based and signature-less threats.
  • Improved Visibility: Offers clear dashboard analytics for network monitoring.

Companies in sectors like finance, healthcare, and enterprise security utilize Trellix Network Detection and Response for tasks such as network intrusion detection, endpoint protection, and securing data transmission paths. It aids in threat investigations, pre-sales demos, and network forensics, reducing risks by protecting against cyber threats like phishing.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

French Ministry of Education, RWTH Aachen, Avency, Cegedim, Cobweb, Intel Security, Cemex Mauser, R_sler Oberfl_chentechnik
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
July 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls. Updated: July 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.