Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #79. Juniper holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

222 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Read 3 NETSCOUT vSTREAM reviews

432 Views
333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT vSTREAM and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network management solutions. Marvis has the upper hand with its AI-driven insights and user-friendly approach.

Features: NETSCOUT vSTREAM provides extensive packet-level network analysis, detailed traffic visibility, and issue diagnosis. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-powered predictive maintenance, proactive troubleshooting, and automated network insights.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT vSTREAM could improve ease of use, reduce setup complexity, and offer more automated troubleshooting. Marvis could enhance technical detail in network analysis, offer more advanced data metrics, and provide options for on-premise deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT vSTREAM involves a complex setup due to its configurability, whereas Marvis offers streamlined, cloud-based deployment making integration simpler. Marvis stands out for responsive AI-enhanced support, while NETSCOUT focuses on expert technical support frameworks.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT vSTREAM generally has a higher initial cost but offers significant ROI from enhanced insights. Marvis is more cost-effective initially with its cloud model, achieving ROI through reduced troubleshooting time and improved reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

79th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT vSTREAM is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Moreno Musardo

Consultant

Troubleshooting at the packet level helps us resolve issues more quickly

The solution provides increased visibility during an IT deployment. It enables us to troubleshoot a service when it is down. As we expand our company, more users are using the tool to quickly resolve issues. It helps us and them get to root cause quickly. For example, last week a DNS was not running anymore. We checked the packet and saw that there was a buffer overload. It has cut our overall troubleshooting time. Sometimes it took a month to troubleshoot something that we can now do within days. nGenius has helped increase application or network uptime. The DNS I mentioned is now a better server with more capacity than before, because of our troubleshooting. We see a measurable decrease in mean time to know and mean time to repair. We see that when our customers are using this tool, their stability on the link is getting better and better, every time they use it. Also, we use the solution for unified communication application performance and it helps with uptime and end-user experience. Sometimes the quality of voice calls is not good enough, so we use the Media Monitor to check the quality in real-time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"One of the valuable features is the packet decoding."

"vSTREAM gives us better visibility and reporting about our network infrastructure, allowing for cost-optimization."

Cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"Room for improvement exists in filtering in the packet decode."

"I would like to see improvements made to the user guide."

"I would like for it to have a smaller footprint of the virtual appliance and better performance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"Licensing is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 40% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 31% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 29% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 100% of the time

More NETSCOUT vSTREAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download NETSCOUT vSTREAM product report

Also Known As

No data available

vSTREAM

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

The vSTREAM virtual appliance complements existing Adaptive Session Intelligence (ASI)-based instrumentation to provide the same level of visibility within virtualized and cloud infrastructures that is already possible in physical environments. The vSTREAM virtual appliance is ideal for monitoring service-critical traffic running within virtualized or cloud infrastructures, either locally on a host or as an aggregation point for multiple hosts. With complete visibility across physical, virtual and cloud networks, the vSTREAM virtual appliance presents real-time views of end-to-end call trace data and network-wide KPIs, to protect the reliability and availability of networks and application services.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Metropolitan Police Agency, Banpara, PropertyRoom.com

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

April 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.