No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs SecOps Solution comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Software Distribution (7th), Configuration Management (26th)
SecOps Solution
Ranking in Patch Management
47th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (38th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 3.6%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecOps Solution is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus3.6%
SecOps Solution0.5%
Other95.9%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

ManojNair2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Centralized patching has unified multi‑OS management and delivers detailed security reporting
Based on my experience, a better function would be to address the problem that the product only scans a machine once a day. It has a central scanning activity that scans every laptop for changes in assets, meaning both hardware and software, as well as installed software for patches. However, this activity works only once per day and does not work on local time. If you are a global organization with the UK office and a colleague in the US, for example, and you set the task at 11:00 AM UK time, that translates to 6:00 AM in the US East Coast. If that colleague's laptop is on, the task completes; otherwise, it fails. This represents a major drawback because the task does not run on the local time of the system. Regarding the ability to create multiple tasks, you cannot create them, which is another significant issue. Only one task exists for these two activities. That one task performs both the hardware and software scanning for any changes and also conducts a patch scan. Both activities occur through the same task, but the problem is that if you have a global user base, this becomes a bottleneck.
Use SecOps Solution?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
919,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is pretty reasonable. Currently, I am paying around three dollars per agent per month.
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Based on my experience, a better function would be to address the problem that the product only scans a machine once a day. It has a central scanning activity that scans every laptop for changes in...
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus was the first solution on the cloud six years ago when I started using this product. Although other competitors existed in the market, they were either behind in ter...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
1. Google 2. Amazon Web Services 3. Microsoft Azure 4. IBM Cloud 5. Oracle Cloud 6. Cisco Systems 7. Palo Alto Networks 8. Fortinet 9. Check Point Software Technologies 10. Symantec 11. Trend Micro 12. Kaspersky Lab 13. McAfee 14. Avast Software 15. Bitdefender 16. ESET 17. Sophos 18. Comodo Group 19. FSecure 20. G DATA CyberDefense 
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Ivanti and others in Patch Management. Updated: October 2026.
919,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.