ManageEngine OpManager vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,050 Views
1,504 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ManageEngine OpManager are competitors in the network monitoring software market. ScienceLogic appears to have an advantage in enterprise-level environments due to its automation and integration capabilities, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is favored for cost-effectiveness and simplicity in monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic stands out with customizable dashboards, rich integration options, and built-in automation for fault reduction and efficiency. It excels in supporting multi-tenant environments and comprehensive event management. ManageEngine OpManager offers robust network monitoring, clear alerts and notifications, and cost-efficient operations, making it ideal for straightforward monitoring needs.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic struggles with a complex interface, reporting limitations, and some technical support issues. Users suggest enhancements for reporting and easier configuration. ManageEngine OpManager could improve its storage monitoring, backup solutions, and dashboard flexibility. Its software performance is affected in larger infrastructures, indicating a need for optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports both cloud and on-premises deployments. It has a mixed reputation for technical support but receives praise for its technical vision and dedicated service. ManageEngine OpManager mainly operates on-premises and has varying feedback on deployment ease. While its service is generally positive, improvements in documentation and support are needed.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is pricier, targeting enterprises with flexible pricing models. Its ROI is linked to problem resolution and proactive monitoring, despite high initial costs. ManageEngine OpManager is competitively priced, offering an affordable option with tangible ROI through comprehensive monitoring without high additional costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"OpManager can monitor network utilization, downtime, and services in real time."

"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."

"The tool is useful for SNMP monitoring."

"The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs."

"The integration with the firewall monitoring, the security monitoring, is great."

"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"Power packs."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."

"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."

"Real user and UI monitoring are not practical."

"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."

"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."

"If you have a ton of devices, it might slow down a bit."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not worth the money."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"It is reasonably priced."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

31%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 14% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

NetBrain vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 2% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 8% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

ManageEngine OpManager

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic