LogRhythm NetMon vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,015 Views
802 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and LogRhythm NetMon compete in the IT management and network monitoring category. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand due to its superior customization and integration capabilities which cater to diverse IT environments effectively.

Features: ScienceLogic offers customizable dashboards, dynamic apps, and runbook automation, enhancing alarm reduction. It supports a multi-tenant environment and extensive monitoring capabilities for seamless system integration. LogRhythm NetMon provides robust traffic analysis and deep packet inspection.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic needs to enhance its reporting, simplify its interface, and expand API support. Additionally, it lacks application monitoring and SNMP trap processing needs improvement. LogRhythm NetMon should improve cost efficiency, integration features, and tighter product platform integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports on-premises, private, and public cloud environments, with superior customer service noted for quick response times and knowledgeable staff. LogRhythm NetMon also supports on-premises deployment but has inconsistent customer support, needing better technical assistance and communication.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing model is flexible but can be expensive as the number of devices increases, though it offers positive ROI through reduced outage times and better incident visibility. LogRhythm NetMon is costly, particularly for smaller companies, and while some perceive it as offering good value, its expense may not be justifiable for all businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: June 2025).

LogRhythm NetMon vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

56th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (13th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (21st), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (16th), AIOps (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros

Information Security Analyst at Detecon Al Saudia Company Limited

A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"The power flow is great."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 31% of the time

Compared 21% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 15% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

LogRhythm NetMon

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

No data available

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

LogRhythm NetMon vs. ScienceLogic