We performed a comparison between LogMeIn Central and Pulseway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, TeamViewer and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)."Unattended remote assistance."
"It saves us drive time, we don't have to go to clients. We can just use remote access."
"No issues with stability. It has worked on every platform I’ve tried it on, and not interfered with anything."
"The ability to remotely access machines with no user intervention required at the remote terminal. Other software we used needed someone to click a link and do a download for me to provide support. Now, with LogMeIn Central, I can get in and fix things while they are away from their desks."
"Unattended Access, allows me to do support on machines that people are having trouble with, during non-working hours."
"It is convenient for my workers to be at home. Therefore, it is easier for them as their second job to do the work. That is a plus, and I improve productivity."
"The alerts are helpful."
"One of the improvements they made was a LogMeIn Central client - that was a couple years ago - and that has been great. You no longer have to use their web interface. There's actually a client that you can install, which lists all of the machines and servers that you can access. That works really well."
"The solution has great workflow and server modules."
"We like the patching of the window updates in the client's systems. You can automatically do updates with a single click."
"It has been very helpful to get notifications about various issues with my servers and network to help me take action to resolve problems before they become major issues."
"It gives you remote control and has a mobile app."
"The setup is simple."
"It's not really a true RMM product but more of just a remote access."
"The update issues are an absolute pain. It says it is updating things, but the updates do not go through, and you try your hardest to get the updates to go through and they don't. You go to the PC, but there is no update there, then you go back and it says there are updates."
"I do not like the antivirus."
"Our clients are having issues with printing."
"File transfer on the free version needs improvement. Allow file transfer with drag and drop to and from Remote Desktop. "
"The solution is expensive as hell."
"It needs backwards compatibility for non-Microsoft-supported operating systems, for example, XP and 2003. In situations where I have no options but to run older operating systems, I would like for it to be backwards compatible."
"Sometimes it just fails to load."
"There are some bugs or glitches."
"The solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer."
"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."
"GUI needs to be improved and the solution lacks a process for monitoring VOIP calls."
"It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop."
LogMeIn Central is ranked 10th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 19 reviews while Pulseway is ranked 13th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 6 reviews. LogMeIn Central is rated 8.6, while Pulseway is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LogMeIn Central writes "Fast with an easy setup and a good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulseway writes "A solution with a great monitoring system and ability to control access remotely". LogMeIn Central is most compared with TeamViewer, NinjaOne, Microsoft Configuration Manager, LogMeIn Rescue and Atera, whereas Pulseway is most compared with Zabbix, Kaseya VSA, Microsoft Configuration Manager and PRTG Network Monitor.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
