No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

LiveAgent vs metaphactory comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LiveAgent
Ranking in Knowledge Management Software
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (36th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (34th)
metaphactory
Ranking in Knowledge Management Software
36th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Knowledge Management Software category, the mindshare of LiveAgent is 3.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of metaphactory is 1.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Knowledge Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
LiveAgent3.6%
metaphactory1.0%
Other95.4%
Knowledge Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1729971 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant customer support manager
Prioritizes tasks and easily organizes messages and responses
I've not really noticed anything that needs to be improved with the solution. Generally, I enjoyed everything. Every feature LiveAgent has was a seamless journey for me. Maybe there are others who might notice one or two flaws on LiveAgent. I use LiveAgent, but based on my position in the company as a live chat professional, there is a level that I am restricted to. There are other products that are more popular and effective than LiveAgent, like Zendesk and HubSpot. They are among the most popular live chat products, and they have more users. I will advise that LiveAgent should look at what these other people are doing and use it to improve themselves. LiveAgent should add more functionalities.
Geraud Fokou - PeerSpot reviewer
Knowledge Engineer at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees
Ontology design has streamlined product recommendations but still needs native data integration
metaphactory could be improved in terms of data integration. For now, you can design ontologies and taxonomies, but you cannot directly implement, natively, the integration of data associated with the different taxonomies, which makes the integration of mapping engines like R2RML very useful. It would be interesting if metaphactory could also integrate engines for creating inference rules, because the goal of knowledge graphs is to create inference rules, and managing inference rules as well would be interesting. Regarding metaphactory’s artificial intelligence capabilities, I would say that governance and data security is something that for me is not integrated. Overall, when I look at metaphactory, I don’t think of security; I think of integration, and while there is access management, security is something else. At the beginning, the AI features were really just tests, and the results, in terms of reliability and accuracy, were not really there yet, remaining quite tentative. Since then, I haven’t had the chance to test the AI side further. I do not have any other improvements to suggest.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature was how the solution helped us to prioritize tasks."
"My experience with LiveAgent so far has been a seamless one."
"Provides service level optimization."
"I like that this solution provides the history and control over every process connected to a building so we can see everything that's happened since we started using this solution."
"What I like most about metaphactory's ontology and taxonomy creation interface is the direct integration between several taxonomies in the same domain."
"metaphactory is a central tool for implementing these data products. We're considering it for pharmaceutical modeling and connecting to graph databases. It's the only product our company uses with Graph DB."
 

Cons

"There are other products that are more popular."
"I'd like to see an improved API to the system, rather than other softwares having to trigger everything."
"Connection to other softwares could be improved."
"There are other products that are more popular and effective than LiveAgent, like Zendesk and HubSpot."
"At the beginning, the AI features were really just tests, and the results, in terms of reliability and accuracy, were not really there yet, remaining quite tentative."
"For improvements, I'd like to see more maturity in the product, especially regarding enterprise vendor lock-in. The whole area isn't mature enough yet. I think it will develop over time. More competitors are coming up now. I'd like to see better integration with specific vendors who specialize in managing data products. We need more standards beyond the W3C standards from the semantic web that have been around for twenty-five years."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Knowledge Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
25%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Retailer
16%
Construction Company
9%
Construction Company
30%
Insurance Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange, Huawei, T Mobile, eOn, Solid Trust Pay, G4S, Oxford University
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Notion, Atlassian, Zendesk and others in Knowledge Management Software. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.