No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Layer7 API Management vs Oracle API Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management
Ranking in API Management
16th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle API Management
Ranking in API Management
34th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 1.9%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle API Management is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Layer7 API Management1.9%
Oracle API Management1.0%
Other97.1%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Integration capabilities excel and support for varied platforms enhances communication across backend systems
We mainly use REST APIs, and the solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It allows communication with a number of back-end providers and data consolidation. The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable. Code changes and migration are straightforward, and it supports identity and access management integration.
Sagar SampadMall - PeerSpot reviewer
IT-Operation Head at Granules India Ltd
Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure
My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the security with its out-of-the-box policies."
"We have been able to accelerate our clients’ transition to digital organizations by using the CA API Gateway to rapidly expose legacy business services as RESTful APIs, adding industry-leading security to the APIs, and providing a Developer Portal that provides governance, control, visibility, and organization of the entire API stack."
"As an organization grow, you can use CA API Management for authentication purposes through the CA API Gateway. It allows for multiple identity providers with different Active Directories."
"It has improved API governance, gives analytics to API performance, and provided abstraction to the solution providers."
"Technical support is excellent, and I would rate them as ten."
"The speed and versatility in the implementation of APIs without writing a line of code in any programming language."
"CA has incredible reach in the market across industries, and they have got a very compelling platform that enables organizations to easily develop and roll out mobile applications."
"The actual management of APIs is fundamental to us, as we're a heavy API user/provider. So, obviously, a centralised management platform is important."
"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."
"The product has been very easy to use."
"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."
"It has helped us to better organize, control and monitor the APIs across the solution landscape in the enterprise."
"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."
"We've found it to be very stable."
"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."
 

Cons

"Increase tools for manipulation of JSON messages."
"The portal is not the most intuitive and the way things are displayed makes it difficult to find the information we need."
"As the number of instances increases, its complexity of installation increases if you do not use the OVA."
"They should incorporate deeper monitoring features into the solution to make the offering more complete."
"There could be more integration options included in the product."
"ESM gives a hard time. For example, 7.3 to 8.3 migration is hardest."
"We have an on-premise solution as well, which we still have some issues with, but we're still moving forward."
"As well as the SOA Gateway - that is, the API Gateway; we call it the SOA Gateway - we also are now deploying the developer portal component of the SOA Gateway. That has limitations."
"Oracle needs to improve on access to technical documentation."
"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."
"Although it is working great for us at the moment, we don't enjoy its user-interface. The UI is based on an old approach and needs an overhaul to modernize the UI and user interaction."
"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."
"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."
"The cost of the solution is very high. It's not very cheap."
"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on your use case of course, how much you want to go with that, because it can get pricey and depends on the size of your company."
"If you do a TCO of more than five years, then you will see a big jump in costs for some vendors."
"Purchase 4.0 now and wait until they flush out the 4.1 problems."
"Licenses are required to operate the product, but I don't know much about the validity periods attached to it."
"It is a pricey product, although not extremely overpriced compared to competitors in the market."
"I think it's competitive. It's not that expensive when you compare CA with the Oracle product."
"We weren't comfortable with the pricing of licensing. It was slightly more expensive than its competitors."
"It's my manager who takes care of the pricing. But I keep on hearing that it's a little pricey, it's on the higher side. That is what he says."
"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
12%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Performing Arts
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise84
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?
Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...
What is your primary use case for Layer7 API Management?
I am not the client. I implement Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ) for the clients. I have worked on multiple projects as a developer, implementing for Hydro Tasmani...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. IBM  2. Microsoft  3. Oracle  4. Salesforce  5. SAP  6. Cisco  7. Dell  8. HP  9. Adobe  10. VMware  11. Accenture  12. Capgemini  13. Deloitte  14. PwC  15. Ernst & Young  16. Infosys  17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)  18. Wipro  19. Cognizant  20. HCL Technologies  21. Tech Mahindra  22. Fujitsu  23. Hitachi  24. NEC  25. NTT Data  26. Ericsson  27. Nokia  28. Siemens  29. AT&T  30. Verizon  31. Vodafone  32. Orange
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.