LastPass vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LastPass Logo
596 views|550 comparisons
78% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
1,390 views|1,008 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LastPass and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed LastPass vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's always hard to put a value on return on investment. You avoid one breach and it's paid for a million times over. We got a penetration test company internally, just to see how secure our network is, and there happened to be one bit of software that had been overlooked by an external company that managed it. It hadn't been upgraded so that managed to get them into the network. They would've been able to access through the test thing a file that we had previously. If that was a real-life scenario they would have been able to get into our network and get full access to our organization's passwords. If they did get in, they would have gotten access to the cloud. The ROI we see is that we are completely secured compared to what we had previously where there was a vulnerability.""The shared folders is an important feature. It's the primary feature we use. Also, the ability for LastPass to autofill and hide the passwords, so we don't have to keep changing passwords every time a person leaves, is valuable.""The initial setup for this process is straightforward and extremely easy. It just works.""It is easy to use.""The most valuable feature for me is being able to pair applications and user permissions.""Scalability is fine, no issues with that, especially now that they have added different user-level permissions. That has made it a lot easier to delegate out certain features to have other people do.""Tech support has been good. We haven't needed it much, because it is not a complex application. There is not that much you have to do with it.""This product helps keep us secure."

More LastPass Pros →

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices.""Good support for single sign-on protocols.""Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well.""It is very easy to scale and use as you want.""The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Pros →

Cons
"LastPass has a problem syncing the passwords to all of the users.""Right now we have two products; there is the password manager and there is the authenticator app. Ideally, these should be fully integrated and support better handling of two-factor authentication or any other authenticator data.""The biggest thing is there is no good way to have LastPass rotate passwords without human intervention. Right now, we have to go into each folder, then rotate and manually update each password. It can be done it by loading a bunch of passwords into a spreadsheet, but this makes the whole process insecure because then the passwords have been noted into a spreadsheet which have to be upload. We have to go into 40 to 50 applications and manually update passwords, because we don't view their solution of writing a bunch of passwords on a spreadsheet, then uploading them as a secure solution. This should be done internally within LastPass.""We have issues from time to time where, for some reason, it just keeps auto logging-out the user and then, the next day, they'll come in and it will work just fine.""The ability to set up an account expiration limit/date would be very useful.""I also don't like the add-in for Internet Explorer and Google Chrome, because when you do the add-in, you can actually save that to your credentials in your IE, and the problem is, if I left my screen open, or any of the IT people leave their screen open someone could come up and access all their credentials in LastPass without having to put a password in within your own network. I don't like that functionality. We've banned that from any of our staff adding that as an add-in because we see that as a security risk.""Our biggest issue over the years was around the stability of the LDAP sync to AD.""I would like to be able to reduce the log out time of the session."

More LastPass Cons →

"The product’s technical support services could be better.""Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated.""Security could be improved.""They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If you import from sources like XML, keepass, CSV files be sure to clean the import files, this reduces the adjustments in the slow tool itself."
  • "You do not have to purchase licenses for your entire organization. You can scale as adoption grows."
  • "The previous pricing was of good value. I don't really know, as of now, whether the new pricing is. The Enterprise license is $48 per license per year now. That is a steep increase of $24, which is what it was when we first signed up."
  • "It would be nice to do a quarterly true-up process with them versus having to buy 50 licenses at a time when we realize we're out, then we have to buy more. So far, they have been nice about letting us exceed our allotment and just letting us true-up on our own, but a more robust quarterly true-up process would be good."
  • "The pricing and licensing are okay. Basically, at the last contract negotiation, they attempted to jack the rate up and we just said, "No." We still did negotiations with them, but they bumped everything up quite a bit."
  • "LastPass was cheap as chips. It was very cheap, hence one of the reasons we went with it. If you're a small organization and you're after something that'll do 90% of your requirements, it's very good. Licensing and all that was really cheap and simple to understand."
  • "I have been involved with many password managers. Passportal, Secret Server, CyberArk, and BeyondTrust. I chose LastPass for our organization because of the pricing. The organization didn't want to implement something really expensive. LastPass, for what it's offering, for the price that it's offering the service, is unbeatable."
  • "In terms of pricing, my feeling is that they are all roughly the same. LastPass is in line with its competitors, plus or minute a dollar or two per month."
  • More LastPass Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."
  • "If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."
  • "The license is around $8000 USD."
  • "Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."
  • More Red Hat Single Sign On Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.
    Top Answer:Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive. There are similar local solutions available at low-cost.
    Top Answer:The product’s technical support services could be better. Additionally, they should add complimentary software security versions.
    Ranking
    22nd
    Views
    596
    Comparisons
    550
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    11th
    Views
    1,390
    Comparisons
    1,008
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    227
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LastPass Business, LastPass Enterprise, Lastpasss
    Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO
    Learn More
    Overview

    Auto-pilot for all your passwords

    LastPass removes obstacles, letting you get back to the things you love most.

    Log in and go

    Once you save a password in LastPass, you'll always have it when you need it; logging in is fast and easy.

    Passwordless login

    Gain instant access to your LastPass vault by using the LastPass Authenticator instead of your master password.

    Generate strong passwords

    The built-in password generator creates long, randomized passwords that protect against hacking.

    Store digital records

    Insurance cards, memberships, Wi-Fi passwords... keep all your notes safe and easy to find.

    Share effortlessly

    Some things shouldn't be sent in a text. Conveniently and safely share passwords and notes with anyone.

    Dark web monitoring

    Stop worrying about data breaches. Get alerts if your personal information is at risk.

    Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

    Sample Customers
    Deakin University, Duke University, Code.org, Influitive, PeopleKeys, SMA Technologies, Skynamo
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer13%
    Engineering Company13%
    Non Tech Company13%
    Legal Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    LastPass vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LastPass vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    LastPass is ranked 22nd in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. LastPass is rated 7.4, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LastPass writes "Straightforward to set up, good support, intuitive to use, and offers good value for the cost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". LastPass is most compared with Azure Key Vault, BeyondTrust Password Safe, HashiCorp Vault, Keeper and CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, AWS IAM Identity Center and PingFederate. See our LastPass vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.