LAMP Stack CentOS vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) comparison

Supported Images and Red Hat are both solutions in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category. Supported Images is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.5, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9. Supported Images holds a 0.2% mindshare in OSB, compared to Red Hat’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Supported Images users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

LAMP Stack CentOS

Read 3 LAMP Stack CentOS reviews

856 Views
120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Read 431 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) reviews

26,856 Views
26,319 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

LAMP Stack CentOS

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Red Hat Enterprise Linux RHEL and LAMP Stack CentOS compete in the enterprise server solutions category. RHEL has the upper hand due to its extensive support and certification, while LAMP Stack CentOS offers greater flexibility and a lower cost approach.

Features: RHEL is known for robust security features, broad compatibility with enterprise applications, and comprehensive support options. LAMP Stack CentOS benefits from its open-source nature, community-driven support, and ease of integration with web applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEL provides a structured deployment model with guided support and regular updates, enhancing reliability. CentOS offers easier deployment due to its open-source flexibility, though it lacks formal support.

Pricing and ROI: RHEL involves higher upfront costs due to licensing fees, ensuring substantial ROI for large-scale deployments. LAMP Stack CentOS, being free, offers a cost-effective solution with lower direct ROI but significant value for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Operating Systems (OS) for Business Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LAMP Stack CentOS

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

38th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

2.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

431

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category, the mindshare of LAMP Stack CentOS is 0.2%. The mindshare of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is 7.0%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operating Systems (OS) for Business Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)	7.0%
LAMP Stack CentOS	0.2%
Other	92.8%

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

Featured Reviews

FedirPlotnikov

Senior Cloud Engineer at Globant

Reliable hosting stack has supported long-term PHP website and application development

In my opinion, the best features LAMP Stack CentOS offers include a reliable and predictable solution for hosting PHP applications. The stability of the solutions and the CentOS and Red Hat release policy make it predictable for me, which ensures that I always have a tested and stable version in the official repositories. LAMP Stack CentOS has impacted my organization positively as it was the main stack for the development and hosting of the developed solutions for some of the companies. This impacted my teams and business outcomes as the whole business was based on the ability to release PHP-based applications, so it is basically one of the core services for the business.

Read full review

Gowtham Chettikam

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Automation has transformed daily operations and supports secure, continuous infrastructure

When considering improvements to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), I see one primary area. Within your portal, if you provided more study material along with demonstrations similar to the sessions we are attending, which feature a user-friendly guide, you could incorporate this into your Red Hat console. When I want to install an agent or something else, typing in the console should provide me with clear step-by-step instructions. Throughout the years, installation steps have been available, but regarding AI agents or Ansible automation, I need to verify whether clear information exists. Including this information would be beneficial. Additionally, if you add the sessions that have occurred to your portal or another location, this would help us review them multiple times to gain better understanding. Time is limited, and many sessions occur simultaneously, making it impossible to attend everything. Making these sessions available on your website would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LAMP Stack CentOS has impacted my organization positively as it was the main stack for the development and hosting of the developed solutions for some of the companies."

"LAMP Stack CentOS builds client trust that we can get our projects live in no time and builds credibility for the organization."

"LAMP Stack CentOS has positively impacted my organization by providing a standard, zero-license, licensing-free gateway into the Red Hat enterprise ecosystem."

"Red Hat provides us with stability and uptime, and it gives us all the tools we need to integrate with our other solutions."

"The systems are just bulletproof. We do not have problems with it. Support for file system differences and migrations has been solid."

"I like the stability that comes with Red Hat. That has always been the feature that I like."

"I enjoy the patching processes and the way Red Hat Enterprise Linux has elements set up. I have never had a patch session fail, even when installing a thousand packages at a time."

"The most valuable features of RHEL are the availability, file system performance, and overall system availability."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) helps me feel very comfortable knowing that I have vendor support for whatever happens, as I can open a ticket and someone will be there with me figuring out what happened, so I feel very safe using RHEL."

"The maturity of the OS helps with the stability."

"The most valuable feature is the Identity Management. You pay almost the same subscription cost for normal RHEL and you get the central Identity Management. You would need to pay much more if you were using other applications or products like Active Directory from Microsoft."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pros

Cons

"The bigger area for improvement for LAMP Stack CentOS is overall ecosystem lifecycle predictability."

"The performance of LAMP Stack CentOS when handling high-traffic websites or demanding workloads might require us to set up some load balancing."

"LAMP Stack CentOS can be improved by tracking the CVEs and releasing fixes as fast as possible."

"The price has room for improvement."

"Data migration issues during upgrades can sometimes arise from the layers above Red Hat Enterprise Linux."

"The performance of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) could be improved, especially under high load scenarios or when running applications involving AI."

"It is a bit on the pricier side. However, due to the stability and support that they provide to my management and me, we really don't see a reason to choose another way to go. It is hard to get good support."

"One of the pain points we have found is that for Windows systems, it is pretty easy to domain join those in a federated model. It seems we have to either have a third-party product or it is not quite as straightforward to domain join Linux OSs. This would be something that could potentially be smoother in the future."

"We have experienced some issues with the support."

"The Authselect tool needs improvement. This tool is used to connect your system to an identity provider or directory service, e.g., openLDAP. There is documentation and descriptions. While there are a few use cases and examples described, it is sometimes hard to use these tools to set up the configuration that we need for our specific environment. I would like it if there was more general information about the tool, not just describing a use case. For example, here is how to do it and how to connect to some kind of openLDAP service as well as more information about when you need to configure certificate services and mutual authentication."

"We have experienced some downtime, crashes, or performance issues with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), especially now with AI and many vulnerabilities that appear."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable and less expensive than other products such as Windows or Oracle."

"Pricing is sometimes an issue for our clients because it's not a cheap solution. The different licenses have a high cost, and perhaps they could improve by offering different kinds of discounts or lowering the price to make this solution more appealing compared to other cloud providers."

"As a developer, I pay around 10,000 Yen, which is around $100 per annum for support. SUSE and Red Hat are typically the same without standard support. The pricing is not a big deal. Enterprise customers will pay for the support."

"I don't have any issues with the licensing or pricing. In general, OpenShift is a little more expensive."

"The combined cost of implementing in hybrid and cloud environments to fulfill all our client's needs can be considerable."

"We are an educational institution and as such, what we pay is less than the average company."

"It's pretty expensive, but I'm not familiar with the pricing of other vendors for their operating systems. I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of pricing. Red Hat Enterprise Linux's main advantage is the support that you get by purchasing their subscriptions."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user281973

Storage and VMware Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 24, 2017

It's improved our company's system environments that run Oracle databases.

Red Hat is mission critical to our environment Red Hat has improved the mission critical environments running Oracle databases, while CentOS has improved our web environment and MySQL. Oracle and SAP Environment and all HPC environments. 10 years No issues Very stable i don´t find any problem…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

57%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Transportation Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	92
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	307

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which would you choose - RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) or CentOS?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and stability, and also lots of features. I specifically like that the solution has fe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

My experience with the pricing, the setup cost, and the licensing of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has been pretty good. I have no complaints.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

I've never really thought about how Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) could be improved, but the only thing I wish they had that I've asked Red Hat for so far is something resembling managed service ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) vs LAMP Stack CentOS

Compared 100% of the time

More LAMP Stack CentOS Competitors

SUSE Linux Enterprise vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 9% of the time

Ubuntu Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 9% of the time

Windows Server vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 8% of the time

AlmaLinux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

May 2026

Download LAMP Stack CentOS product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

May 2026

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) product report

Also Known As

LAMP Stack on CentOS

Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for AWS

Overview

LAMP Stack CentOS offers a reliable platform for deploying web applications. By combining Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP on a CentOS operating system, it provides a consistent environment for building and running complex web applications.

This solution is commonly used in web hosting and IT environments due to its open-source nature, making it cost-effective and flexible. LAMP Stack CentOS is valued for its stability and security, which are critical for developing and maintaining web applications. It benefits developers and system administrators by providing a proven combination of technologies that streamline various processes, reducing development time and improving performance.

What are the key features of LAMP Stack CentOS?

Open-Source Platform: Provides a cost-effective solution for businesses.
Robust Security: Ensures a secure environment for web services.
Comprehensive Documentation: Offers extensive resources for troubleshooting and development.
Flexibility: Supports a wide range of applications and configurations.

Why should businesses consider LAMP Stack CentOS?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with its open-source nature and minimal licensing fees.
Enhanced Performance: Delivers superior web application speed.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs without significant modifications.
Community Support: Access to a large community of developers for support and innovation.

In retail and e-commerce, LAMP Stack CentOS is favored for its ability to handle large volumes of online transactions securely, ensuring website performance during high traffic periods. In healthcare, it enables secure patient data management systems, maintaining compliance with industry standards. Its adaptability makes it suitable for diverse business environments.

Supported Images

Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers stability, security, and support for mission-critical applications with robust tools and scalable architecture, ideal for diverse environments and hybrid cloud compatibility.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides organizations with a reliable platform ideal for high-performance computing and virtualization. Known for its robust security and seamless network administration, it integrates well with OpenShift and Ansible, ensuring adaptability and scalability. Despite challenges with documentation, upgrade complexity, and cost, RHEL remains a formidable choice thanks to its comprehensive documentation and extensive community support.

What are the key features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux?

Stability and Security: Maintains high stability and advanced security measures, critical for enterprise environments.
Extensive Support: Offers robust support through community and documentation, assisting with problem-solving and integration.
Automation with Ansible: Simplifies tasks and enhances efficiency, optimizing operations across the infrastructure.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Supports cloud environments, enabling flexibility and strategic deployments.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to different workloads, making it suitable for growing organizational demands.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat Enterprise Linux?

Reliable Performance: Ensures consistent and secure operations across diverse environments, including cloud infrastructure.
Efficient Management: Centralized operations make it easy to manage enterprise workloads effectively.
Community and Documentation: Access to a strong community and comprehensive documentation aids in resolving issues.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with technologies like OpenShift and SAP, enhancing operational versatility.
Adaptability: Supports a wide range of environments and technical requirements, improving strategic deployment.

Organizations across industries like financial services, telecommunications, and application hosting implement Red Hat Enterprise Linux for server and application management. Its compatibility with technologies such as SAP, Oracle, and Ansible supports functions including web, database, and enterprise solutions, ensuring stable and secure performance in high-pressure environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Travel Channel, Mohawk Industries, Hilti, Molecular Health, Exolgan, Hotelplan Group, Emory University, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, HCA Healthcare, Paychex, UPS, Intermountain Healthcare, Brinker International, TransUnion, Union Bank, CA Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Canonical, Rocky Linux and others in Operating Systems (OS) for Business. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.