We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"The document understanding is good."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."
"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Test Automation Tools with 19 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 9.0, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Perfecto, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and froglogic Squish. See our LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
