LambdaTest vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

LambdaTest and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. LambdaTest holds a 2.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

1,269 Views
914 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,684 Views
1,598 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2025

LambdaTest and UiPath Test Cloud compete in software testing. LambdaTest excels in affordability and support, whereas UiPath Test Cloud offers superior features leading to higher satisfaction.

Features: LambdaTest supports cross-browser testing, real-time testing on over 2,000 combinations, and seamless integration with CI/CD tools. UiPath Test Cloud features robust automation, integration within RPA ecosystems, and document understanding, making it ideal for process-driven testing.

Room for Improvement: LambdaTest can improve by expanding device support, refining local testing processes, and enhancing real device testing. UiPath Test Cloud could benefit from simplifying initial setup, improving cost-effectiveness, and enhancing the interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LambdaTest offers easy deployment, facilitating quick onboarding and efficient support. UiPath Test Cloud provides comprehensive customer service with extensive documentation but requires a steeper learning curve for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: LambdaTest provides a cost-effective setup with a strong ROI for cross-browser testing. UiPath Test Cloud demands a more substantial investment, justified by returns through automation features and scalability in large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,823 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 2.0%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 5.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

Deborah Yarosh

VP Technology Automation at Finance Of America Mortgage LLC

Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement

UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"Automation and mobile testing have improved our efficiency."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"

More LambdaTest pros

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"LambdaTest needs to improve its speed and memory because it takes a long time to load."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

More LambdaTest cons

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"This is an affordable product."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 66% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 16% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

May 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

April 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.