Klocwork vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Perforce and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Perforce is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.2, while PortSwigger is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. Perforce holds a 1.4% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Klocwork

Read 24 Klocwork reviews

2,304 Views
1,396 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

2,942 Views
1,779 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Klocwork

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Klocwork compete in software security testing and code analysis. User reviews indicate PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional has an upper hand due to its extensive features and pricing structure, while Klocwork stands out for its in-depth functionality and comprehensive features.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers a comprehensive suite of web security testing tools, real-time scanning, and intuitive workflow capabilities. It is effective in identifying security vulnerabilities efficiently. Klocwork excels in deep static code analysis, integration capabilities, and detailed code scrutiny, making it ideal for complex codebases and larger projects.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could enhance its reporting tools and reduce resource consumption during intensive scans. Klocwork users suggest improving the highlighting of false positives and enhancing integration with more development environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is praised for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support, making user onboarding seamless. Klocwork, although offering a robust setup, requires more configuration to match specific project needs, which can lead to additional customer service contact.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is recognized for its competitive pricing and rapid return on investment. Klocwork's setup cost is higher, but users find it worthwhile due to the extensive benefits for large-scale projects needing detailed code analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Klocwork vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Klocwork

Ranking in Application Security Tools

18th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (5th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One can increase the number of vendors, so the solution is scalable."

"We like using the static analysis and code refactoring, which are very valuable because of our requirements to meet safety critical levels and reliability."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is finding defects while you're doing the coding. For example, if you have an IDE plug-in of Klocwork on Visual Studio or Eclipse, you can find the faults; similar to using spell check on Word, you can find out defects during the development phase, which means that you don't have to wait till the development is over to find the flaws and address the deficiencies. I also find language support in Klocwork good because it used to support only C, C++, C#, and Java, but now, it also supports Java scripts and Python."

"The tool helps the team to think beforehand about corner cases or potential bugs that might arise in real-time."

"The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is its reduced setup time."

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

More Klocwork pros

"The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent, managing response time and quality efficiently without any issues."

"The initial setup is simple."

"You can scan any number of applications and it updates its database."

"The solution is quite helpful for session management and configuration."

"This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps."

"I rate PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional ten points out of ten."

"It offers very good accuracy. You can trust the results."

"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions."

"What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity."

"I would like to see better codes between projects and a more user-friendly desktop in the next release."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"Now the only issue we have is that whenever we need to get the code we have to build it first. Then we can get the report."

"Klocwork does have a problem with true positives. It only found 30% of true positives in the Juliet test case."

"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."

"This solution could be improved if they offered support of more languages including Ada and Golang. They currently only support seven languages."

More Klocwork cons

"The solution lacks sufficient stability."

"Scanning needs to be improved in enterprise and professional versions."

"The scanner and crawler need to be improved."

"If your application uses multi-factor authentication, registration management cannot be automated."

"I need the solution to be more user-friendly. The solution needs to be user-friendly."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional can improve by having more features in the free version for beginners to try."

"BurpSuite has some issues regarding authentication with OAT tokens that need to be improved."

"The solution doesn't offer very good scalability."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."

"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is expensive compared to other tools."

"There are different licenses available that include a free version."

"Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition."

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Klocwork?

It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits. Currently, this feature is absent, but we have suggested it to the team.

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 33% of the time

Coverity vs Klocwork

Compared 30% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

June 2025

Download Klocwork product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

May 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

No data available

Burp

Overview

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

June 2025

Free Report: Klocwork vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Klocwork vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Klocwork vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.