IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Kiteworks vs. RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]

Kiteworks vs RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo
Control-M
Read 36 Control-M reviews.
31,301 views|12,909 comparisons
Kiteworks Logo
Kiteworks
1,063 views|881 comparisons
RepliWeb Logo
RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]
views| comparisons
Featured Review
Zahidullah Williams
In real-time, I can monitor jobs, failures, or anything that might be stuck
Our SAP jobs are fairly critical, because there are a lot of collections from a financial aspect coming through on a daily basis. From that regard,... Read more →
Use Kiteworks?
Use RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]?
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer: 
    Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    What is the biggest difference between Oracle DAC Scheduler and Control-M?
    Top Answer: 
    Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer: 
    As soon as you have an issue, a ticket is created and the tech support is quite responsive.
    Read all 36 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Accellion
    Learn More
    BMC
    Kiteworks
    RepliWeb
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

    Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

    Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.
    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn More
    Learn more about Kiteworks
    Learn More
    Learn more about RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Mylan, The MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL
    Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm35%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer8%
    Transportation Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise81%
    No Data Available
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    April 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kiteworks is ranked 14th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is ranked unranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Kiteworks is rated 0.0, while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Kiteworks is most compared with HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT, MOVEit, Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, AWS Transfer for SFTP and Globalscape Managed File Transfer, whereas RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with MOVEit, Cornerstone MFT, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Safe-T Secure Application Access and AWS Transfer for SFTP.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.