We performed a comparison between Kinetica and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."The solution scales easily."
"Auto-partitioning and indexing, and resource allocation on the fly are key features."
"The most valuable features of Teradata are that it is a massively parallel platform and I can receive a lot of data and get the queries out correctly, especially if it's been appropriately designed. The native features make it very suitable for multiple large data tasks in a structured data environment. Additionally, the automation is very good."
"The feature that we find most valuable is its ability to perform Massive Parallel Processing."
"When it comes to integration, tools like Informatica seamlessly connect with Teradata. We ensure the Teradata database is configured correctly in Informatica, including the proper hostname and properties for the load process. We didn't find any major complexity or issues with integration."
"The performance is great, we are able to query our data in one operation."
"The key advantages are Performance when processing Terabytes of data and scalability."
"There are several features of Teradata that I like. One of the most basic is the indexes. I also like that it provides lower TCO. It also has the optimizer feature which is a good feature and isn't found in other legacy systems. Parallelism is also another feature I like in Teradata because when you are running or hosting on multiple systems, you have this shared-nothing architecture that helps. Loading and unloading in Teradata are also really helpful compared to other systems."
"Improved performance of ETL procedures, reporting."
"There are very limited resources available in the market in terms of implementation. They need to offer training plans for graduates so that more resources are available in the market."
"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."
"I think the UI is not there yet. It could be improved by being more user-friendly."
"The solution is stable. However, there are times when we are using large amounts of data and we can see some latency issues."
"GUI of administrative tools is really outdated."
"Data synchronization to the DR site."
"The solution needs improvement in its stability, support and pricing."
"The capability to implement it with comparable performance across various private cloud environments, ensuring adaptability to different infrastructure setups would be beneficial."
"I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."
Kinetica is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. Kinetica is rated 7.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kinetica writes "Easy to scale and good record to report capabilities but needs better training ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". Kinetica is most compared with OmniSci and SingleStore, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.