No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Keyedln Manufacturing vs Oracle E-Business Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Keyedln Manufacturing
Ranking in Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle E-Business Suite
Ranking in Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
157
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (1st), ERP (4th), Activity Based Costing Software (1st), Benefits Administration (5th), Product Configuration and Quoting (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing category, the mindshare of Keyedln Manufacturing is 3.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite is 12.9%, down from 22.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle E-Business Suite12.9%
Keyedln Manufacturing3.9%
Other83.2%
Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing
 

Featured Reviews

Use Keyedln Manufacturing?
Leave a review
Md. Mazharul Islam - PeerSpot reviewer
Incharge Corporate Accounts & ERP System at General Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Has connected financial data across departments and improved future cash flow planning
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be connected to the finance module, and I think Oracle provides the right solution. Also, SAP, IFS, or Microsoft Dynamics 365 offer some solutions, but I am not as happy with them as I am with Oracle. I believe that Oracle E-Business Suite could improve by transitioning from Java-based scripts in our system to a web-based environment. While Oracle already has JD Edwards available in web-based format, I think it needs to be smoother for optimization and presentation in the future. In comparison, IFS is fully web-based, and all applications are sufficiently good and user-friendly. We are developing and trying to improve to a web-based setup, but it is currently too costly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing solutions are best for your needs.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise35
Large Enterprise114
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite?
The pricing for Oracle E-Business Suite is varying high, depending on the country. For small businesses or those generating low revenue, it is often expensive. However, for governments or multinati...
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite?
Oracle E-Business Suite has already provided many solutions and continues to do so for implementers and consultancy firms. They offer many benefits through easy steps, support forums, and communiti...
What is your primary use case for Oracle E-Business Suite?
I am working on an ERP solution that Oracle provides, which is Oracle E-Business Suite. Oracle E-Business Suite contains many modules that cover tax, finance, HR, projects, and many solutions they ...
 

Also Known As

Keyedln ERP
Oracle EBS, OEBS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mosaic, Catalyst Hydraulics, Advoque, Universal Metalcraft
Colab, Portobello, Saudi Telecom Company, DG Khan Cement, Dubai Holding