No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management vs ketl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ketl
Ranking in Document Management Software
18th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Purview Data Life...
Ranking in Document Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Email Archiving (8th), Data Governance (27th), Microsoft Security Suite (30th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Document Management Software category, the mindshare of ketl is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management is 7.2%, down from 15.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Document Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management7.2%
ketl1.2%
Other91.6%
Document Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Eric Halff - PeerSpot reviewer
Partner at Arkion SA
Efficient with good AI features and a simple UX
The solution is adding billing and timesheets (coming soon). Ketl knows that integrating timesheeting and invoicing would add to the whole centralized hub system. Since Ketl is aware of user activities on documents (Office, PDFs, emails, etc.), it can suggest timesheets for each user to be later confirmed. This will save hours of time and add to our billing since we will forget less of our billable time. We estimate 5% to 10% of our billable hours are lost during the year since we forget to note a small task. With automated timesheeting, billing will be less burdensome and more effective.
RK
Cloud Security & Governance at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
A comprehensive data management solution shows potential for improvement while providing strong integration with existing infrastructure
One of the requirements is to have data leak policies and data access policies. This is very critical to enforce data governance standards, which relate to data classification, access control, data protection, and retention. It covers the entire lifecycle, helping us to protect, detect, and classify the documents. Challenges are mostly related to the security products onboarded into the bank; they have challenges in terms of those products complying with the internal standards. Sometimes, we cannot just use the DLP across the state. For example, using Microsoft products has been easy to adopt, such as OneDrive and SharePoint on-premise, but it becomes a challenge when it comes to AWS, as data also exists in S3 buckets. Testing is still ongoing, but it will eventually be done. The time it takes to scan is one issue; when we raise high-volume issues and tickets related to scanning failures, it relates to permission errors, which are technical challenges. These take time because we have high volume tickets in terms of connectivity, scanning failures, and related matters. There are also frequent change requests, especially regarding scoping or rescoping due to complexities, creating several challenges. In both organizations I work with, there are gaps, and there is no enterprise-wide data classification available. However, there are pockets of implementations for various products. Some agencies are using it, but otherwise, there's no product existing across the enterprise. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management is definitely a good solution, but there is significant room for improvement from a product perspective. Reporting is another area that needs improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Every email and scanned document will be automatically linked to one of my customers and related projects."
"The impact of Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management on my unified data catalog has improved a lot; the improvements I see are in the lineage, the discovery, and the labeling."
"The UI is the most valuable feature."
"The system is stable; I haven't encountered any worldwide stability issues unlike other office products."
 

Cons

"We estimate 5% to 10% of our billable hours are lost during the year since we forget to note a small task. With automated timesheeting, billing will be less burdensome and more effective. (This is a feature that is coming soon)"
"I think labeling could use a lot more AI assistance. AI implementation into labeling would be beneficial."
"Microsoft's Purview Data Lifecycle Management preview features can be unreliable, hindering their usefulness."
"The time it takes to scan is one issue; when we raise high-volume issues and tickets related to scanning failures, it relates to permission errors, which are technical challenges."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The service operates on a pay-as-you-go basis, charging an extra one cent per field of metadata scanned in our data."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management?
We opted for Purview Data Lifecycle Management due to its significant cost advantage over competitors. At a 95 percent price reduction, it was a clear winner. The service operates on a pay-as-you-g...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management?
I think labeling could use a lot more AI assistance. AI implementation into labeling would be beneficial.
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management?
My major use case for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management is for the classification of data.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Information Governance, Microsoft Purview Records Management
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland, Microsoft, Conga and others in Document Management Software. Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.