Kentik vs LogRhythm NetMon comparison

Kentik and LogRhythm are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kentik is ranked #33 with an average rating of 9.0, while LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7. Kentik holds a 0.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to LogRhythm’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LogRhythm users who would recommend it.

Kentik

Read 16 Kentik reviews

1,158 Views
546 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews

564 Views
266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kentik

LogRhythm NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kentik and LogRhythm NetMon compete in the network monitoring space. Based on user reviews, Kentik seems to have an edge with its cost-effective pricing and automation capabilities, while LogRhythm NetMon impresses with its robust threat detection and deep packet analytics.

Features: Kentik provides real-time network insights with its SaaS-based platform, allowing for advanced flow analytics and DDoS mitigation. It is recognized for ease of use, customization, and powerful data analysis tools. LogRhythm NetMon offers deep packet inspection, comprehensive threat detection, and AI integration for security operations, making it a strong player in cybersecurity strategies.

Room for Improvement: Kentik users suggest enhancements in user access control and API usability, alongside improved anomaly detection. LogRhythm NetMon needs better integration with third-party tools, increased cost efficiency, and improved support for recent technologies like Windows 2016.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kentik allows flexible deployment options, such as on-premises and private cloud, and is praised for excellent customer support. LogRhythm NetMon, mainly on-premises, could improve its tech support with faster response times and more integrated platform solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Kentik's pricing is comprehensive and provides value through network management optimization, though it requires a significant upfront investment. LogRhythm NetMon is mid-range but potentially expensive for smaller businesses due to additional professional service costs, offering high value in advanced analytics but needing careful cost evaluation.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentik vs. LogRhythm NetMon Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (17th)

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

56th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kentik is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

ADRIANA SALDARRIAGA TOBON

Sales Manager at IFX NEtworks

Client experience and cybersecurity have improved with an easy setup

The solution is valuable for client experience, especially in the financial sector. The most important feature is cybersecurity. The pricing is good, but the functionality is the most important aspect for clients. The solution is easy to deploy and requires only one person to set up, making it easy and quick. Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives.

Read full review

KeithGalleros

Information Security Analyst at Detecon Al Saudia Company Limited

A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives."

"We're pretty happy with the API functionality. It's web, and it's very simple to set up queries. It has served us well and you don't need to be an expert on the API or the product to set these things up."

"I am able to do a lot of work on the visualization end to create different visualizations and different ways to get information out of it."

"We're also using Kentik to ingest metrics. It's a useful feature, and its response time, whenever we're pulling back the data, is higher than our on-prem solution."

"The most important feature is cybersecurity."

"The most valuable feature is being able to pull traffic patterns; to and from destinations. We're able to understand where our traffic is going, our top talkers from an AS set, as well as where our traffic's coming from."

"The most valuable features have been anything around traffic engineering: being able to determine the source or destination of a surge of traffic, whether it's DDoS-related, or a customer just happened to have a sudden uptick in traffic. Being able to tell where that's coming from or where it's going to enables us to do things based on that."

"The drill-down into detailed views of network activity helps to quickly pinpoint locations and causes. All the information is there."

More Kentik pros

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

Cons

"They're moving more in a direction where they are saying, "Hey, here's information that you may be interested in or may a need," before the question has to explicitly be asked. Continuing to move in that direction would be a good thing."

"There is room for improvement around the usability of the API. It's a hugely complex task to call it and you need a lot of backing to be able to do it. I should say, as someone who's not in networking, maybe it's easier for people who are in networking, but for me that one part is not very user-friendly."

"Sometimes, the tool has complications, so we must deal with the additional support from the tool's end."

"I consider the pricing model as an area for improvement."

"I would like to see them explore the area of cost analysis."

"The product could strive for more improvements to become closer to perfect."

"We had faced some issues during an outage and were not able to get the desired results from Kentik tools. It took time to resolve these issues, which is why I give them eight points."

"In recent months, I've noticed that while the industry is trending towards AI, Kentik has room for improvement in this area."

More Kentik cons

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

I would say Kentik's pricing is not cheap. From my perspective as part of the technical team, I would not categorize it as expensive, but I know it is not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kentik?

There's always room for improvements and better relations when using any kind of product. We faced some issues with Kentik UI and alerting, which we asked them to fix, and they succeeded. They have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

We are using Kentik mostly for synthetic tests, and from one last year, network monitoring as well. We are using it for inter DC BGP tests and server monitoring as well.

See all answers

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Kentik

Compared 14% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Kentik

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs Kentik

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs Kentik

Compared 9% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Kentik

Compared 9% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 31% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 21% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 15% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kentik

June 2025

Download Kentik product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogRhythm Network Monitor

Overview

Kentik's AIOps Network Traffic Intelligence platform unifies network operations, performance, security, and business intelligence.

With a purpose-built big data engine delivered as public or private SaaS, Kentik captures a high-resolution view of actual network traffic data and enriches it with critical application and business data, so every network event or analysis can be tied to revenue & costs, customer & user experience, performance & risk.

Kentik

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

Sample Customers

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

Sera-Brynn

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Free Report: Kentik vs. LogRhythm NetMon

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentik vs. LogRhythm NetMon and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentik vs. LogRhythm NetMon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.