Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kentico vs Wordpress.com VIP comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kentico
Ranking in Web Content Management
17th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (13th)
Wordpress.com VIP
Ranking in Web Content Management
27th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of Kentico is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wordpress.com VIP is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

AB
The advanced marketing suite has helped us to establish our US business
Our primary use case is to deliver enterprise level web solutions It has helped us establish our business in the USA and allows us to work with a range of corporate clients. The most valuable features are its integration capabilities and advanced marketing suite. This product needs an out of…
it_user134607 - PeerSpot reviewer
It helps us quickly install blogs, publish articles, and optimize SEO, but scaling it requires experienced engineers.
To use any product, write down your desired goals and usage scenarios, implement the core product. Spend enough time using the product and testing its functionality. Start by searching readymade plugins to supplement your functionality. Do not rush to write your own code until you did enough search on readymade plugins. If any functionality is available through third party plugin with fees, do not write it if you can afford paying the price and asking for third party developer support and development. Act as the end user, do not deal with the product as a developer. Measure your results with users satisfaction and goals achievement, do not measure results with your own developer mindset. Work with users from day one, do not build and build for long time before you get users feedback. Implement the product, and monitor how your users are using it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Real Estate/Law Firm
12%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Does Kentico provide good options for marketing?
Absolutely! I can't stress enough how important marketing is for the digital experience you're giving to customers. If you want to reach your clients through multiple channels, each type of content...
What is the content management system of Kentico like?
In my experience, Kentico has been a very flexible and easy-to-use content management system. Keep in mind that we haven't been using it for a while because our management decided to change DXPs fo...
What do you use Kentico for?
Hello, I think Kentico will serve you well as a digital experience platform and especially for commerce purposes. We at my company have been using this feature of the DXP as well because we recentl...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Gibson Musical Instruments, Mazda, Segway, Twinings, Ingram Micro, Allergan, Kingspan
Gigaom, Re/code, Grantland, National Post, TIME.com, National Post, LIN Media, NFL Blogs, Tim Ferriss, NextDraft, Metro UK, USA Today, Foreign Policy, NBC
Find out what your peers are saying about Kentico vs. Wordpress.com VIP and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.